A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[The development of the life evaluation questionnaire for hemodialysis patients]. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Current quality of life measures for end-stage renal failure (ESRF) do not account for patients' personal perspectives on evaluating their lives, which previous qualitative research has highlighted as crucial for clinical practice.
  • Three studies were conducted to quantify and validate a new questionnaire that captures these personal evaluations of life among hemodialysis patients, focusing on aspects like limitations and feelings towards caregivers.
  • The results support the questionnaire's reliability and validity, indicating it can effectively complement existing quality of life measures tailored for patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Article Abstract

Objective: Existing quality of life measures fail to incorporate patients' own understanding of evaluation of life following the diagnosis of end stage renal failure (ESRF). Previous qualitative research has identified ways of evaluating life that have not been captured by existing quantitative research and that can be possible targets for clinical practice. Nonetheless, quantification is necessary if clinicians are to be informed of potentially important ways of evaluating life. It is also necessary to devise patient-derived measures of quality of life if the aim is also to monitor improvement in ways of evaluating life following interventions devised to change them.

Method: Three studies were carried out. In the first two, the ways of evaluating life that were previously identified were quantified, a questionnaire that measures ways of evaluating life was developed, and the clinical utility of this questionnaire was examined in a sample of 156 hemodialysis patients. In the third study the predictive validity of this questionnaire was examined in a sample of 153 hemodialysis patients.

Results: The findings identified a number of targets for clinical practice. These included feeling unable to 'get round' limitations, mixed negative feelings about caregivers, and failure to find something positive about ESRF The newly developed 3 subscales of life evaluation were internally consistent. The findings also show that thes subscales had construct and predictive validity.

Conclusion: The present studies provide a disease-specific life evaluation questionnaire consisting of 3 subscale for use in hemodialysis patients that can supplement existing generic quality of life measures.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ways evaluating
20
evaluating life
20
life
12
life evaluation
12
quality life
12
evaluation questionnaire
8
life measures
8
targets clinical
8
clinical practice
8
questionnaire examined
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!