Background: Progressive hip flexion deformity is a common problem in ambulatory children with spastic cerebral palsy, causing static and dynamic deformity. The iliopsoas muscle is recognized as a major deforming force in the development of this problem. Many clinicians address this problem by lengthening the iliopsoas, either in an intramuscular location at the pelvic brim or by complete tenotomy at the lesser trochanter. The goal of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients with ambulatory cerebral palsy who had intramuscular lengthening at the pelvic brim to those who underwent complete release of the iliopsoas tendon at the level of the lesser trochanter.
Methods: Twenty patients were included in the study, 11 of whom had iliopsoas release at the lesser trochanter (group 1) and 9 of whom had intramuscular lengthening at the pelvic brim (group 2). All patients had physical examinations, plus kinematic and kinetic analyses in our gait laboratory before and 1 year after surgery.
Results: Hip flexion contracture was decreased significantly only in group 1, although there was a trend of decrease in group 2. There was a significant increase in maximum hip extension in terminal stance and a reciprocal decrease in maximum swing phase hip flexion in group 1, with a similar trend that did not reach significance in group 2. Stride length increased significantly in both groups. There was no significant change in power generation of hip flexion during the swing phase in either group.
Conclusions: We found improved static and dynamic parameters of hip extension after iliopsoas lengthening and did not detect any adverse kinematic or kinetic change in hip function after surgery. The improvement was more robust in the group who underwent release at the lesser trochanter. Because there are no adverse effects of iliopsoas release from the lesser trochanter and the improvement in hip extension is greater, this approach should be considered in ambulatory patients with spastic diplegia when a hip flexor weakening procedure is considered.
Level Of Evidence: Comparative cohort study, level III, case-control study.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e31819c4041 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
An Argument for Plate Utilization in Distal Femur Fractures.
J Orthop Trauma
December 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Periprosthetic fractures and their associated complications present significant challenges for orthopaedic surgeons. It is important to provide an overview of the current management of periprosthetic fractures, including techniques for osteosynthesis and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty, as well as special considerations for periprosthetic acetabular fractures, periprosthetic tibial fractures, and interprosthetic femur fractures. In addition, the guiding principles for the management of potential subsequent complications including infection, nonunion, and instability are discussed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPeriprosthetic femur fractures around the hip are one of the most common aseptic complications following total hip arthroplasty. Understanding the risk factors of periprosthetic femur fracture can aid surgeons in the prevention of these injuries. The Vancouver classification provides a reproducible description of the factors that should be considered in the treatment of patients with periprosthetic femur fractures: fracture site, implant stability, and bone stock.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOsteotomies around the knee have a variety of indications, including pain reduction, functional improvement, knee joint stabilization, and articular cartilage preservation. Thorough preoperative planning is essential, including a determination of the precise location of any deformity (proximal tibia, distal femur, or both). High tibial osteotomies and distal femoral osteotomies can be performed in isolation, or jointly in the form of a double-level osteotomy, for correction of coronal and/or sagittal deformity of the knee.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAssociations Between Skeletal Alignment and Biomechanical Symmetry Before and After Transfemoral Bone-anchored Limb Implantation.
Clin Orthop Relat Res
December 2024
Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Background: Patients with transfemoral amputation experience socket-related problems and musculoskeletal overuse injuries, both of which are exacerbated by asymmetric joint loading and alignment. Bone-anchored limbs are a promising alternative to treat chronic socket-related problems by directly attaching the prosthesis to the residual limb through an osseointegrated implant; however, it remains unknown how changes in alignment facilitated through a bone-anchored limb relate to loading asymmetry.
Questions/purposes: What is the association between femur-pelvis alignment and hip loading asymmetry during walking before and 12 months after transfemoral bone-anchored limb implantation?
Methods: Between 2019 and 2022, we performed 66 bone-anchored limb implantation surgeries on 63 individuals with chronic socket-related problems.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!