AI Article Synopsis
- The study compared a new monitor module for measuring auditory evoked potentials (BAEP and MLAEP) with an established device to see if it could serve as a replacement.
- The results indicated that while BAEP latencies were shorter and amplitudes higher with the established device (Neuropack), MLAEP latencies were similar between devices but they showed considerable variability, making them not interchangeable.
- Overall, while the new system (S/5) cannot provide reliable diagnostic values, it is still effective for monitoring changes in patients during anesthesia.
Article Abstract
Purpose: Measurement of brain stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) and midlatency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) using a new monitor integrated module was compared with an established device. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the new system could replace the more inconvenient established technique.
Material And Methods: MLAEP and BAEP were obtained from 19 anesthetized male patients using the AEP-Module for Monitor S/5 [GE, Helsinki, Finland (S/5)] and Neuropack 4 mini [Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan (Neuropack)]. Significance of different results was calculated by paired t test. Bias was estimated by Bland-Altman statistics.
Results: Latencies of BAEP were significantly shorter and amplitudes of BAEP were significantly higher for Neuropack. Mean latencies of MLAEP (Pa and Nb) were not significantly different (Pa 44.1+/-4.4 ms vs. 41.9+/-5.4 ms/Nb 66.4+/-5.6 ms vs. 62.8+/-6.5 ms), but methods are not interchangeable owing to great variability (Pa -13.16 to 8.94 ms, Nb -19.15 to 11.79 ms).
Conclusions: BAEP recorded by S/5 cannot be used for diagnostic interpretation using generally accepted normal values, but can be used for examining changes during the monitoring period. Mean values of Pa and Nb were not significantly different, but values of the S/5 varied above and below the values of Neuropack such that the measurements could not be used for diagnostic interpretation. However, this did not reduce their usefulness for determining adequate hypnosis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181990d00 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Improving auditory attention decoding by classifying intracranial responses to glimpsed and masked acoustic events.
Imaging Neurosci (Camb)
April 2024
Department of Electrical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Listeners with hearing loss have trouble following a conversation in multitalker environments. While modern hearing aids can generally amplify speech, these devices are unable to tune into a target speaker without first knowing to which speaker a user aims to attend. Brain-controlled hearing aids have been proposed using auditory attention decoding (AAD) methods, but current methods use the same model to compare the speech stimulus and neural response, regardless of the dynamic overlap between talkers which is known to influence neural encoding.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFunctional and Structural Changes in the Inner Ear and Cochlear Hair Cell Loss Induced by Hypergravity.
Int J Mol Sci
January 2025
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon 22332, Republic of Korea.
Gravitational changes have been shown to cause significant abnormalities in various body systems, including the cardiovascular, immune, vestibular, and musculoskeletal systems. While numerous studies have examined the response of the vestibular system to gravitational stimulation, research on functional changes in the peripheral inner ear remains limited. The inner ear comprises two closely related structures: the vestibule and cochlea.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPredicting the Irrelevant: Neural Effects of Distractor Predictability Depend on Load.
Eur J Neurosci
January 2025
Department of Psychology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Distraction is ubiquitous in human environments. Distracting input is often predictable, but we do not understand when or how humans can exploit this predictability. Here, we ask whether predictable distractors are able to reduce uncertainty in updating the internal predictive model.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNormative Values of Brainstem Auditory-Evoked Responses in Sheep.
Brain Sci
January 2025
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.
The brainstem auditory-evoked response (BAER) is an established electrophysiological measure of neural activity from the auditory nerve up to the brain stem. The BAER is used to diagnose abnormalities in auditory pathways and in neurophysiological human and animal research. However, normative data for BAERs in sheep, which represent an adequate large animal model for translational and basic otological research, are lacking.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRegression-Based Classification of the Middle-Latency Auditory-Evoked Potentials in Vestibular Migraine and Concussion Patients with Dizziness.
Brain Sci
December 2024
Neuroscience Center Zurich, University and ETH Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
Background/objectives: The auditory middle-latency responses (AMLRs) assess central sensory processing beyond the brainstem and serve as a measure of sensory gating. They have clinical relevance in the diagnosis of neurological conditions. In this study, magnitude and habituation of the AMLRs were tested for sensitivity and specificity in classifying dizzy patients with vestibular migraine (VM) and post-concussive syndrome.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!