This study evaluated patient assessments and attitudes regarding incision cosmesis following standard and minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty 1 to 3 years postoperatively. A cosmesis questionnaire designed to elicit a score evaluating scar satisfaction was mailed to patients. Although the difference in total cosmesis score between the standard and minimally invasive groups was not statistically significant, patients with a standard incision had better scores at <1 year. One significant finding was worse responses in the minimal incision patients regarding sinking and curling of scar edges.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20080401-11 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
minimally invasive surgery is the surgery of the present and has become the "gold standard" for the most pathologies. The training of surgeons in minimally invasive techniques is mandatory required to be carried out during the residency program. In Romania, there is no national minimally invasive surgical training program, only universities and certain university hospitals are concerned with this aspect.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDonor derived cell free DNA in lung transplant recipients rises in setting of allograft instability.
Front Transplant
December 2024
Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between longitudinal monitoring of donor-derived cell free DNA (dd-cfDNA) in lung transplant recipients and a "gold standard" of existing tools (pulmonary function testing, radiographic imaging, laboratory and bronchoscopy data, clinical judgment) to assess allograft function.
Methods: 24 consecutive transplant recipients were prospectively enrolled in this study measuring dd-cfDNA levels monthly in the first year after bilateral lung transplant. Blinded clinical adjudications were performed at the same timepoints to categorize allograft function as stable (FEV1 within 10% of prior value or when compared to best two averaged post-transplant values) or unstable.
Comparative Assessment Between the Fundus-First Technique and Standard Laparoscopic Technique in Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
Cureus
November 2024
Department of General Surgery, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, IND.
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a standard minimally invasive technique for the treatment in gallstone disease. In difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies, bailout strategies have been developed of which the fundus-first technique is one. The present study aims to compare the outcomes of the fundus-first technique against the standard laparoscopic approach in managing difficult cholecystectomy cases by focusing on intraoperative factors such as bleeding, bile duct injury, operative time, and postoperative complications like biliary leakage.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMeta-analysis of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lumbar interbody fusion for treating lumbar degenerative diseases.
J Orthop Surg Res
December 2024
Department of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, 6 Shuangyong Road, Nanning, 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.
Objective: This study aims to perform a meta-analysis that integrates multiple literature sources to evaluate the clinical efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for treating lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD).
Methods: A systematic search was conducted across various databases, including CNKI, VIP, WANFANG DATA, SinoMed, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science, for clinical comparative studies on OLIF and MIS-TLIF for treating LDD, covering the time frame from the inception of the databases to September 2024. Following PRISMA guidelines, studies were screened, assessed, and data were extracted rigorously.
Nutritional quality and climate impact of Norwegian adults' diet classified according to the NOVA system.
Nutr J
December 2024
Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Information about how ultra-processed foods (UPF) contribute to the intake of energy and nutrients and environmental impact is important for future food policies and dietary recommendations. This study assessed the contribution of the four NOVA food groups, including UPF, to energy intake, nutritional quality, and climate impact in Norwegian adults' diet. We used dietary data from 348 participants in the Norkost 4 pilot study, collected through two non-consecutive 24-h dietary recalls.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!