This study compared the management, prognostic factors and outcomes of patients with emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN). Twenty-one patients with EPN were studied between September 1996 and August 2005, and were assigned to two groups. Patients in Group 1 received conservative treatment with/without percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) while patients in Group 2 underwent nephrectomy following medical treatment and PCD. A post hoc analysis of the prognostic factors was performed between survivors and nonsurvivors, and between the survivors in Group 1 and Group 2. There were 14 patients in Group 1, and seven in Group 2. The mortality in Group 1 was 35.7% (5/14) and in Group 2 was 0% (p = 0.12). There were no statistically significant differences in prognostic factors between the two groups, though patients in Group 1 had relatively lower platelet counts (p = 0.07) and Group 2 patients had a higher incidence of dialysis after nephrectomy (p = 0.03). Comparing the survivors and nonsurvivors, patients with comorbid congestive heart failure and patients initially presenting with consciousness disturbances had higher mortalities (p = 0.02 and p < 0.01, respectively). Nonsurvivors also had lower platelet counts (p = 0.06). In conclusion, medical treatment with/without PCD can be used to manage patients with EPN. More agressive drainage is needed in patients with congestive heart failure who initially present with consciousness disturbances or thrombocytopenia.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70035-XDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients group
16
prognostic factors
12
patients
11
group
10
emphysematous pyelonephritis
8
patients epn
8
groups patients
8
treatment with/without
8
medical treatment
8
survivors nonsurvivors
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!