The mean frequency of transcriptional bursting and its variation in single cells.

J Math Biol

Department of Mathematics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA.

Published: January 2010

AI Article Synopsis

  • The new RNA detection technique allows for real-time observation of gene transcription in living cells, revealing that gene expression occurs in bursts rather than steadily.
  • The study employs a three state model to analyze how environmental signals and cellular contexts regulate this random transcription process, introducing a master operator to solve complex equations related to transcriptional bursting.
  • Findings indicate that this model results in less transcriptional noise compared to simpler models, with important insights suggesting that steady-state measurements may overlook critical transcription dynamics, especially during the initial transcription cycles.

Article Abstract

The recent in vivo RNA detection technique has allowed real-time monitoring of gene transcription in individual living cells, revealing that genes can be transcribed randomly in a bursting fashion that short periods of rapid production of multiple transcripts are interspersed with relatively long periods of no production. In this work, we utilize the three state model to study how environmental signals and the intrinsic cellular contexts are combined to regulate stochastic gene transcription. We introduce a system of three master equations to model the stochastic occurrence of transcriptional bursting. As this system cannot be solved analytically, we introduce a linear operator, called the master operator. It is of significant mathematical interests of its own and transforms the mean frequency of transcriptional bursting mu(t) and the second moment mu2(t) into the unique solutions of the respective operator equations. Following this novel approach, we have found the exact forms of mu(t) and the variance sigma2(t). Our analysis shows that the three state transition process produces less noisy transcription than a single Poisson process does, and more transition steps average out rather than propagate fluctuations of transcripts among individual cells. The noise strength phi(t) = sigma2(t)/mu(t) displays highly non-trivial dynamics during the first two to three transcription cycles. It declines steeply from the beginning until reaching the absolute minimum value, and then bounces back suddenly to a flat level close to the steady-state. Our numerical simulations further demonstrate that the cellular signals that produce the least noisy population at steady-state may not generate the least noisy population in a finite time, and suggest that measurements at steady-state may not necessarily capture most essential features of transcription noise.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00285-009-0258-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

transcriptional bursting
12
frequency transcriptional
8
gene transcription
8
three state
8
noisy population
8
transcription
5
bursting
4
bursting variation
4
variation single
4
single cells
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!