Introduction: The literature has shown that subjective concepts lead to interobserver variations in the definitions and identifications of cephalometric landmarks. Observers must be trained and calibrated to conduct scientific research using cephalometric comparisons. In this study, we aimed to develop and test a computational model called Cyclops cephalometry in radiographic cephalometry training and calibration.

Methods: This system uses the concepts of evaluation process managers, examiners, and testers, thus affording uniformity in cephalometric evaluations. The system was tested with 5 orthodontists and 5 postgraduate students who located 28 landmarks in 10 lateral cephalometric radiographs before and after training.

Results: Before training, the Student t test showed significant differences (P <0.05) in accuracy between the orthodontists and the students (71.4% and 54.9%, respectively). However, considerable improvement in accuracy was observed after training in both groups (86.5% and 83%, respectively), without significant differences (P = 0.30) between groups. Users of the system agreed about its usability aspects such as effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction.

Conclusions: This model was shown to be a useful and efficient tool in the calibration process, and might be helpful in various comparative cephalometric investigations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.018DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cephalometric
5
software system
4
system calibrating
4
calibrating examiners
4
examiners cephalometric
4
cephalometric point
4
point identification
4
identification introduction
4
introduction literature
4
literature subjective
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!