Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This article is based on a literature review comparing insertion techniques of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA). I will be looking at the manufacturer's recommended technique and identifying alternative methods, adapted for ease of use, patient comfort or individual circumstances. Risks associated with LMA use will be identified and examples given of research carried out to limit these risks.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/175045890901900104 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!