A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Second generation GUEPAR total arthroplasty of the thumb basal joint: 50 months follow-up in 84 cases. | LitMetric

Second generation GUEPAR total arthroplasty of the thumb basal joint: 50 months follow-up in 84 cases.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res

Clinique d'orthopédie B, hôpital Roger-Salengro, CHRU de Lille, boulevard Emile-Laine, 59045 Lille cedex, France.

Published: February 2009

Background: Osteoarthritis of the thumb basal joint is the most common location for hand degenerative joint disease. First, carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthroplasty is one treatment option. The purpose of this article is to present the outcome of the GUEPAR II prosthesis, a total trapeziometacarpal cemented implant of the retaining ball-and-socket design type. Numerous other advantageous features of this implant, second generation of an earlier version are explored.

Hypothesis: Clinical and radiological results confirm the GUEPAR II trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty as a reliable and efficient evolution of earlier prosthetic designs.

Materials And Methods: Eighty-four GUEPAR II prostheses were implanted to treat advanced and severely incapacitating first CMC osteoarthritis. The average follow-up time in this collaborative series (from 2 centers) was 50 months.

Results: There were no intraoperative complications and no dislocations at the final follow-up evaluation, 92% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied with their results with objective improvement of their Kapandji score. Strength was closely comparable to the nonaffected side. Radiographic studies at the final follow-up evaluations did not show (except in one socket revision instance) signs of implant loosening. On occasion, non-progressive radiolucent lines were observed. More than 80% of the patients remained pain free.

Conclusions: In our series, GUEPAR II total joint arthroplasty of the thumb CMC joint has proven to be efficacious, improving motion, strength, and achieving a high degree of pain relief. Successful outcome appears in our experience contingent upon strict compliance with numerous surgical technique details. Current research focuses on improving bipolar fixation by developing press-fit cementless implants.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2008.06.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

second generation
8
guepar total
8
arthroplasty thumb
8
thumb basal
8
basal joint
8
cmc joint
8
joint arthroplasty
8
final follow-up
8
joint
6
guepar
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!