Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of arcuate keratotomy (AK) performed with a femtosecond laser (FSL) or Hanna keratome (Moria, Anthony, France) for correction of postkeratoplasty astigmatism.
Design: Prospective, randomized study.
Methods: This clinical study included 20 eyes. Two groups of 10 eyes underwent AK using an FLS or keratome. Refractive and keratometric astigmatism were evaluated before surgery and 6 months after surgery. The astigmatic changes in the 2 groups were measured through arithmetic and vector analysis (Alpins method).
Results: Six months after surgery, the mean uncorrected and corrected visual acuities did not change significantly. The mean preoperative refractive cylinder was 8.6 +/- 3.0 diopters (D) and 6.7 +/- 2.1 D, decreasing to 3.9 +/- 2.4 D and 4.7 +/- 2.4 D after laser AK and mechanized AK, respectively. The mean arithmetic change was significantly higher after laser AK, with a decrease of -55.4 +/- 20.7% (P = .011). Vector analysis showed a systematic undercorrection of astigmatism in both groups with a refractive correction index of 0.82 and 0.90 after laser AK and mechanized AK, respectively. Although no statistically significant differences were detected, a wider spread of angle of error and an almost significant difference of mean absolute angle of error (P = .052) suggest a larger misalignment of treatment during mechanized AK. All cases were uncomplicated after laser AK, 1 microperforation occurred and 1 case with off-center incisions occurred after mechanized AK.
Conclusions: AK performed with the femtosecond laser was effective in reducing postkeratoplasty astigmatism and has some advantages over conventional techniques. However, efficacy could be improved by a more accurate nomogram and alignment of treatment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2008.12.017 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!