A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer with delayed presentation. | LitMetric

Background: Laparoscopic repair has been used to treat perforated peptic ulcers since 1990 and is gaining acceptance. The main concerns are postoperative intra-abdominal collections and performing laparoscopy in the presence of peritonitis.

Methods: From June 2006 to June 2008, 31 patients presenting with a clinical diagnosis of perforated peptic ulcer with peritonitis who underwent laparoscopic omental patch repair were selected. Patients who presented more than 24 hours after the onset of pain were only included for this analysis. Conversion criteria were malignant ulcers, perforations larger than 10 mm, or for technical difficulties. The degree of peritonitis was noted and a thorough wash given. The perforation was repaired by the standard omental patch technique, and the number of sutures were decided according to the size of the perforation. Endpoints were operative time, postoperative pain, length of postoperative hospital stay, and complications.

Results: There were 2 conversions due to technical difficulties. Laparoscopic repair required an average of 105 minutes to complete. The median postoperative stay was 5.5 days while mean duration of pain was 3 days. Four patients had port-site infections and 5 had intra-abdominal collections, which were managed conservatively. There were no chest infections or mortality in our series.

Conclusions: Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer is a safe, reliable procedure even in delayed presentations with peritonitis. It has an acceptable morbidity and all the advantages of the minimally invasive surgical approach.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lap.2008.0328DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

laparoscopic repair
16
perforated peptic
16
peptic ulcer
12
repair perforated
8
intra-abdominal collections
8
omental patch
8
technical difficulties
8
laparoscopic
5
perforated
4
peptic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!