Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Authors' Reply: Commentary on "Protecting User Privacy and Rights in Academic Data-Sharing Partnerships: Principles From a Pilot Program at Crisis Text Line".
J Med Internet Res
January 2025
Crisis Text Line, New York, NY, United States.
We appreciate Reierson's thoughtful commentary on our 2019 paper, which described our experiences, ethical process, judgment calls, and lessons from a 2016-2017 data-sharing pilot between Crisis Text Line and academic researchers. The commentary raises important questions about the ethical conduct of health research in the digital age, particularly regarding informed consent, potential conflicts of interest, and the protection of vulnerable populations. Our article focused specifically on the noncommercial use of Crisis Text Line data for research purposes, so we restrict our reply to points relevant to such usage.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFReply to: Correspondence on "Upper respiratory tract infections in myasthenia gravis: Key considerations and future research directions".
Clin Neurol Neurosurg
January 2025
Department of Internal Medicine, King Saud University Medical City and College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Electronic address:
The Impact of Linguistic Signals on Cognitive Change in Support Seekers in Online Mental Health Communities: Text Analysis and Empirical Study.
J Med Internet Res
January 2025
School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China.
Background: In online mental health communities, the interactions among members can significantly reduce their psychological distress and enhance their mental well-being. The overall quality of support from others varies due to differences in people's capacities to help others. This results in some support seekers' needs being met, while others remain unresolved.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFReply to: Amino acids and KLHL22 do not activate mTORC1 via DEPDC5 degradation.
Nature
January 2025
Institute of Molecular Medicine, College of Future Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
A thematic analysis of UK COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy discussions on Twitter.
BMC Public Health
January 2025
Department of Applied Health Sciences and Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Background: Following UK approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines on 2/12/20 and 30/12/20 respectively, discussions about them emerged on the social media platform Twitter, (now 'X'). Previous research has shown that Twitter/ X is used by the UK public to engage with public health announcements and that social media influences public opinions of vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines, globally. This study explored discussions on Twitter posted in response to the UK government's posts introducing the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!