The effects of nicardipine and propranolol on patients' quality of life were compared during a double-blind, multicentre, parallel, randomised study of hypertension therapy. After a placebo run-in period, the doses for each patient were successfully titrated to reduce supine diastolic blood pressure to less than 90 mmHg with either nicardipine 60 or 90 mg/day (123 patients) or with propranolol 90-240 mg/day (120 patients). Both drugs demonstrated similar efficacy in reducing systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Total duration of therapy ranged from 6-12 weeks. The Nottingham Health Profile questionnaire was used to assess the effect of each treatment on the patients' quality of life. The overall quality of life score for patients on nicardipine showed a tendency toward improvement, while for those on propranolol, the trend was toward overall worsening. The differences between the two treatment groups were statistically significant for males (P = 0.02). The analysis of the separate components of this evaluation demonstrated that physical mobility was reported to be decreased more for the propranolol-treated patients than for the nicardipine-treated patients (P = 0.02). In contrast to the propranolol-treated patients, the nicardipine-treated patients reported improvements for sleep, social life, work, sex life, and for activities related to hobbies and interests. A second questionnaire was used to assess the effects of the therapies on work productivity. Among those patients who worked for pay, more patients treated with propranolol than those treated with nicardipine rated themselves as less productive at work (P = 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
J Eval Clin Pract
February 2025
Ordos Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Ordos City, China.
Background: To investigate the effect of Midnight-noon Ebb-flow combined with five-element music therapy in the continuous nursing of patients with chronic wounds.
Methods: From March 2022 to November 2023, we recruited 50 eligible chronic wound patients and randomly divided them into two groups according to a random number table: the experimental group (n = 25) and the control group (n = 25). The control group was treated with conventional nursing measures.
Public Health Nutr
January 2025
Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, 79 Upland Road, St Lucia, QLD Australia 4067.
Objective: Early education and care (ECEC) is part of the everyday life of most children in developed economies presenting exceptional opportunity to support nutrition and ongoing food preferences. Yet, the degree to which such opportunity is captured in policy-driven assessment and quality ratings of ECEC services is unknown.
Design: Abductive thematic analysis was conducted, guided by key domains of knowledge in nutrition literature and examining identified themes within these domains.
Gut Microbes
December 2025
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University and Richmond VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA.
There is a complex interplay between the gut microbes, liver, and central nervous system, a gut-liver-brain axis, where the brain impacts intestinal and hepatic function while the gut and liver can impact cognition and mental status. Dysregulation of this axis can be seen in numerous diseases. Hepatic encephalopathy, a consequence of cirrhosis, is perhaps the best studied perturbation of this system.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWound Repair Regen
January 2025
Research Unit for Plastic Surgery, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
The WOUND-Q is a patient-reported outcome measure for individuals with any type of chronic wound. This study aimed to identify patient and wound factors associated with the four WOUND-Q health-related quality of life (HRQL) scales: Life impact, Psychological, Sleep, and Social. Adults with a chronic wound were recruited internationally through clinical settings between August 2018 and May 2020, and through an online platform (i.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEClinicalMedicine
October 2024
Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Patients with cancer expect prolonged life (overall survival, OS) or better life (quality of life, QOL) from cancer treatments. However, majority of new cancer drugs are now being approved not based on improved OS or QOL, but based on surrogate endpoints such as tumor shrinkage or delayed tumor progression. These surrogate endpoints, including their validity as a proxy for overall survival, differ based on disease settings and lines of treatment but in general, most surrogate measures have weak correlation with outcomes that matter to patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!