A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Energy expenditure before, during, and after the bench press. | LitMetric

Energy expenditure before, during, and after the bench press.

J Strength Cond Res

Exercise, Health and Sport Sciences, University of Southern Maine, Gorham, Maine, USA.

Published: March 2009

We examined the reliability and validity of non-steady-state aerobic and anaerobic estimations of energy expenditure during and after bouts of the bench press exercise. A Smith machine, not free weights, was used. On different days, 8 subjects (28.4 +/- 9.0 years; 170.4 +/- 11.9 cm; 68.4 +/- 14.0 kg) were randomly assigned to 3 lifting sessions of 7, 14, and 21 reps at 50% of the 1-repetition maximum (9 total sessions). No differences were found in any of the triplicate measures within 7, 14, and 21 reps. Coefficients of variation for 7, 14, and 21 reps were, respectively, for resting blood lactate, 20.3, 24.3, and 26.7%; for anaerobic exercise energy expenditure, 47.9, 29.1, and 14.2%; for aerobic exercise energy expenditure, 47.4, 28.3, and 18.4%; for excess postexercise O2 consumption, 33.0, 26.5, and 29.2%; for total energy expenditure, 21.0, 15.4, and 15.1%; and, for work, 4.5, 5.0, and 5.4%. Anaerobic energy expenditure made a significant contribution to exercise energy expenditure for all lifts (p < 0.05). Changes (Delta) in work were related to changes in energy expenditure (Delta aerobic exercise energy expenditure, r = 0.54; Delta anaerobic exercise energy expenditure, r = 0.88; Delta total energy expenditure, r = 0.88; p < 0.001). Although variability is evident and often considerable during exercise and recovery in this heterogonous sample, we suggest that non-steady-state estimates of aerobic and anaerobic exercise energy expenditure with excess postexercise O2 consumption provide a reasonable estimate of the energy cost of a single bout of weight lifting. Our results agree with those of others, without the need for multiple steady-state measurements or for the assumption of proportional increases between work and O2 uptake.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31818c2845DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

energy expenditure
48
exercise energy
24
energy
13
anaerobic exercise
12
expenditure
11
bench press
8
aerobic anaerobic
8
exercise
8
aerobic exercise
8
excess postexercise
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!