AI Article Synopsis

  • The study analyzed data from a previous clinical trial to see how different prize schedules affect abstinence from drugs.
  • It compared lower and higher chances of winning prizes, as well as different prize sizes (small, large, jumbo).
  • Results showed that a higher probability of winning increased abstinence rates for cocaine users, but did not have the same effect for heroin users.

Article Abstract

Although treatment outcome in prize-based contingency management has been shown to depend on reinforcement schedule, the optimal schedule is still unknown. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis of data from a randomized clinical trial (Ghitza et al., 2007) to determine the effects of the probability of winning a prize (low vs. high) and the size of the prize won (small, large, or jumbo) on likelihood of abstinence until the next urine-collection day for heroin and cocaine users (N=116) in methadone maintenance. Higher probability of winning, but not the size of individual prizes, was associated with a greater percentage of cocaine-negative, but not opiate-negative, urines.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2606595PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2008.41-539DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prize-based contingency
8
contingency management
8
probability winning
8
reinforcement probability
4
probability prize
4
prize size
4
size cocaine
4
cocaine heroin
4
heroin abstinence
4
abstinence prize-based
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!