Exposure assessment was performed during the abatement of amosite containing material (ACM) and chrysotile containing material (CCM). Mean fibre concentrations (MFC) in breathing zone (BZ) were 20.6+/-7.9 f/cc and 6.3+/-2.2 f/cc during abatements of ACM and CCM, respectively. At the fixed station, MFC were 5.4+/-3.5 f/cc for ACM and 2.9 f/cc+/-1.6 for CCM. For observer's BZ, MFC were 3.1+/-1.3 f/cc (ACM) and 1.8 f/cc (CCM) during the abatement. Though elevated, area and observer-type samples clearly underestimate exposure. Exposure remained unacceptable in the worksite with the class of respiratory protection used.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00128-009-9661-4 | DOI Listing |
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol
April 2009
Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Pavillon Marguerite d'Youville, 2375, Chemin de la Côte Ste-Catherine, Montreal, QC H3T 1A8, Canada.
Exposure assessment was performed during the abatement of amosite containing material (ACM) and chrysotile containing material (CCM). Mean fibre concentrations (MFC) in breathing zone (BZ) were 20.6+/-7.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Occup Hyg
June 2008
ChemRisk, 25 Jessie Street, Suite 1800, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA.
The exposure of shipyard workers to asbestos has been frequently investigated during the installation, repair or removal of asbestos insulation. The same level of attention, however, has not been directed to asbestos exposure of maritime seamen or sailors. In this paper, we assemble and analyze historical industrial hygiene (IH) data quantifying airborne asbestos concentrations onboard maritime shipping vessels between 1978 and 1992.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol
December 1992
Price Associates, Inc., Washington, DC 20006.
A substantial number of air samples have been collected during the past few years to measure airborne asbestos levels in buildings with asbestos-containing materials (ACM). These samples fall into two categories: (i) samples collected to measure the exposure of workers while they were engaged in routine maintenance and repair activities; and (ii) samples collected during normal building activity to measure prevalent levels in buildings. The measurements derived from these samples have been compiled and summarized to provide estimates of the airborne asbestos exposure of workers engaged in routine maintenance and repair work and by other building occupants.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRegul Toxicol Pharmacol
August 1989
Clement Associates, Inc., Ruston, Louisiana 71270.
Data from a recent EPA study of airborne asbestos levels in 49 buildings occupied by the General Services Administration (GSA) are statistically analyzed. The study focuses on differences between indoor and outdoor levels, and on differences among buildings with no asbestos-containing material (ACM) (6 buildings), buildings with ACM generally in good condition (6 buildings), and buildings containing damaged ACM (37 buildings). Seven indoor samples and a single outdoor sample were collected from most buildings and analyzed by TEM (transmission electron microscopy) using a direct preparation method.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!