A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Finite element analysis of stress in bone adjacent to dental implants. | LitMetric

Finite element analysis of stress in bone adjacent to dental implants.

J Oral Implantol

Department of Prosthodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, USP, Bauru SP, Brazil.

Published: March 2009

Understanding how clinical variables affect stress distribution facilitates optimal prosthesis design and fabrication and may lead to a decrease in mechanical failures as well as improve implant longevity. In this study, the many clinical variations present in an implant-supported prosthesis were analyzed by a 3-dimensional finite-element method. The anterior segment of a human mandible treated with 5 implants supporting a curved beam was created to perform the tests. The variables introduced in the computer model were cantilever length, elastic modulus of cancellous bone, abutment length, implant length, and framework alloy (AgPd or CoCr). The computer was programmed with physical properties of the materials as derived from the literature, and a 100-N vertical load was used to simulate the occlusal force. Images with fringes of stress were obtained, and the maximum stress at each site was plotted in graphs for comparison. Stresses tended to be concentrated at the cortical bone around the neck of the implant closest to the load, whereas stresses in cancellous bone were considered low. In general, the stress distribution was better with stiffer cancellous bone, longer abutments and implants, and shorter cantilevers. The use of a CoCr alloy framework appears to contribute to a better stress distribution.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2008)34[249:FEAOSI]2.0.CO;2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stress distribution
12
cancellous bone
12
stress
6
bone
5
finite element
4
element analysis
4
analysis stress
4
stress bone
4
bone adjacent
4
adjacent dental
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!