Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: To test the effects of pulmonary rehabilitation on fatigue, functional status and health perceptions in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Design: Randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Pulmonary outpatient department.
Subjects: Thirty patients randomly assigned to a rehabilitation (3 men, 9 women, mean age 66 (+/-2) years) or a control group (10 men, 4 women, mean age 64 (+/-2) years).
Interventions: The patients in the rehabilitation group participated in a multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme comprising exercise training twice weekly, for a 12-week period, nutritional and self-care advice, and education about disease and energy conservation strategies.
Main Measures: Fatigue, functional limitations due to fatigue, functional performance and satisfaction, six-minute walking distance, hand grip strength and health perception were assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks.
Results: At baseline there were no significant differences between the groups, except for gender. The six-minute walking distance was 312.6 (+/-79.3) m for the rehabilitation group and 360.3 (+/-84.7) m for the control group. After 12 weeks, the rehabilitation group improved their walking distance by 40.6 (+/-27.2) m (P<0.05). The rehabilitation group improved in performance (from 4.8 (+/-2.0) to 6.0 (+/-1.5) scores, P<0.01) and satisfaction (from 4.6 (+/-2.2) to 6.0 (+/-2.1) scores, P<0.001) with regard to own selected daily activities. No statistically significant differences were seen between the changes within the rehabilitation group and changes within the control group at the 12-week follow-up.
Conclusions: Although the pulmonary rehabilitation programme had an immediate effect, it was not sustained.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215508096174 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!