Aim: We investigated the efficacy and safety of S-1 monotherapy for the treatment of advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma (BTA) in a clinical practice setting.

Methods: We reviewed clinical data from 217 patients with advanced BTA who were treated with S-1 monotherapy between August 2004 and September 2007.

Results: 162 eligible patients were identified. The primary tumors were intrahepatic (n = 57), in the gall bladder (n = 50), in extrahepatic bile ducts (n = 41) and in the ampulla of Vater (n = 14). Sixteen of 120 assessable patients achieved partial responses, with a response rate of 13.3% (95% CI 7.2-19.4%). Another 51 patients had stable disease, with an overall tumor control rate of 55.8% (95% CI 46.9-64.7%). The median time to progression was 2.7 months and the median overall survival time was 6.9 months. Response rates and survival differed significantly according to the primary site of the tumor (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively), with extrahepatic bile duct adenocarcinoma having the best prognosis. The treatment regimen produced only mild toxicity in most cases (grade 1 or 2), even for patients with hyperbilirubinemia.

Conclusion: S-1 has a favorable toxicity profile and can be safely administered to BTA patients with hyperbilirubinemia. The efficacy of S-1 against advanced BTA depends on the tumor site and is most effective in patients with extrahepatic BTA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000195538DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

s-1 monotherapy
12
patients
9
efficacy safety
8
safety s-1
8
patients advanced
8
advanced biliary
8
biliary tract
8
tract adenocarcinoma
8
advanced bta
8
extrahepatic bile
8

Similar Publications

Patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who fail first- and second-line treatments face significant challenges in third-line therapy, where monotherapies often yield poor outcomes and limited survival benefits. The prognosis is particularly poor for mCRC with the unique molecular subtype of BRAF V600E mutation. This report describes sustained benefits from a third-line treatment regimen (SFS) combining tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1), fruquintinib, and sintilimab in a patient with BRAF V600E-mutated MSS mCRC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A 70-year-old man was admitted to a local hospital with epigastric pain and diagnosed with type-2 gastric cancer. Contrast-enhanced CT scan showed metastases in S3 and S8 of the liver, and the tumor was classified as type cT4aN2H1, cStage ⅣB. Nivolumab monotherapy was initiated after failure of treatment with S-1 plus oxaliplatin and ramucirumab.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) negative advanced gastric cancer (GC) has a high global incidence and mortality rate with limited options for second-line treatment. Monotherapy is not effective and the combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy has not yet been included in the guidelines. The present study aimed to explore a new treatment approach by conducting a single-center, retrospective, observational real-world study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: S-1 monotherapy had previously been widely used as a second-line treatment for pancreatic cancer (PC) after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy mainly in Japan. Based on the results of the NAPOLI-1 trial, the recommended second-line therapy is now liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/folinic acid (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV). However, there have been no studies comparing nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV therapy with S-1 monotherapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Pancreatic cancer is aggressive and often spreads quickly; APS, a traditional Chinese medicine, shows promise in treating various malignant tumors.
  • A recent study examined the effectiveness of combining APS with the GS chemotherapy regimen in 97 pancreatic cancer patients, comparing those who received combination therapy to those who solely received GS.
  • Results showed the combined APS and GS therapy led to better response rates, improved immune function, and fewer adverse side effects compared to GS alone, indicating a potential benefits for long-term survival.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!