This study deals with a reconstruction-type superresolution problem and the accompanying image registration problem simultaneously. We propose a Bayesian approach in which the prior is modeled as a compound Gaussian Markov random field (MRF) and marginalization is performed over unknown variables to avoid overfitting. Our algorithm not only avoids overfitting, but also preserves discontinuity in the estimated image, unlike existing single-layer Gaussian MRF models for Bayesian superresolution. Maximum-marginal-likelihood estimation of the registration parameters is carried out using a variational EM algorithm where hidden variables are marginalized out, and the posterior distribution is variationally approximated by a factorized trial distribution. High-resolution image estimates are obtained through the process of posterior computation in the EM algorithm. Experiments show that our Bayesian approach with the two-layer compound model exhibits better performance both in quantitative measures and visual quality than the single-layer model.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2008.12.005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

markov random
8
variational algorithm
8
bayesian approach
8
superresolution compound
4
compound markov
4
random fields
4
fields variational
4
algorithm
4
algorithm study
4
study deals
4

Similar Publications

Second-line systemic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis based on RCT.

PLoS One

December 2024

Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Affiliated Xuzhou Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China.

Background: The optimal second-line systemic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is inconclusive.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for RCTs comparing second-line systemic treatments for mCRC from the inception of each database up to February 3, 2024. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique was used in this network meta-analysis (NMA) to generate the direct and indirect comparison results among multiple treatments in progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), complete response (CR), partial response (PR), grade 3 and above adverse events (Grade ≥ 3AE), and any adverse events (Any AE).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of combining camrelizumab with rivoceranib versus sorafenib as initial treatment options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) across different developmental regions in China.

Methods: Utilizing TreeAge Pro and data from the phase III randomized CARES-310 clinical trial, a model based on Markov state transitions was developed. Health state utility values were derived from the CARES-310 trial, and direct medical costs were obtained from relevant literature and local pricing data.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This article examines the estimate of ϑ = P [T < Q], using both Bayesian and non-Bayesian methods, utilizing progressively first-failure censored data. Assume that the stress (T) and strength (Q) are independent random variables that follow the Burr III distribution and the Burr XII distribution, respectively, with a common first-shape parameter. The Bayes estimator and maximum likelihood estimator of ϑ are obtained.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Threatened miscarriage is defined as early vaginal bleeding before 12 weeks of gestational age and can occur in any pregnancy regardless of maternal age, race, comorbidities, lifestyle, or socioeconomic status, and about one-quarter of threatened miscarriages proceed to complete miscarriage. To assess the relative effectiveness and safety of different progestogens in women with first threatened miscarriage, using a network meta-analysis. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to April 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Scalable Empirical Bayes Inference and Bayesian Sensitivity Analysis.

Stat Sci

November 2024

Department of Statistics and Data Science, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78705, USA.

Consider a Bayesian setup in which we observe , whose distribution depends on a parameter , that is, . The parameter is unknown and treated as random, and a prior distribution chosen from some parametric family , is to be placed on it. For the subjective Bayesian there is a single prior in the family which represents his or her beliefs about , but determination of this prior is very often extremely difficult.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!