Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: The objective of our study was to compare the ablation zones of two cooled-shaft microwave antennae-one operating at 915 MHz and one operating at 2,450 MHz-in in vivo porcine livers.
Conclusion: The 915-MHz cooled-shaft microwave antenna can lead to deeper penetration of liver tissue and can yield a significantly larger ablation zone than the 2,450-MHz cooled-shaft antenna in in vivo porcine livers. In light of the result, 915-MHz cooled-shaft microwaves may be more effective for tumor ablation, especially for large tumors.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3828 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!