Aims: Continuity equation to evaluate aortic valve area (AVA(CE)) is critically dependent on accurate measurement of left ventricular outflow tract diameter and velocity. To circumvent these limitations, the present study aimed to generate nomograms for a facilitated estimation of aortic valve area using peak aortic valve pressure gradient (DeltapAv) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
Methods And Results: Two hundred and fifty-five subjects with non-invasively and invasively defined aortic valve stenosis (AS) formed the basis of this study. Basis of the nomograms was the correlation analysis between DeltapAv and AVA as estimated by AVA(CE) within different LVEF groups. LVEF differed from 65.6 +/- 1.8% (Group I, LVEF > 60%) to 34.5 +/- 4.3% (Group IV, LVEF > or = 30%). DeltapAv and AVA varied from 85.6 +/- 19.5 mmHg and 0.69 +/- 0.16 cm2 in Group I to 58.5 +/- 15.9 mmHg and 0.73 +/- 0.23 cm2 in Group IV (DeltapAv: P < 0.001). Mean AVA(CE) showed no significant difference between the groups. Correlation between DeltapAv and AVA(CE) was statistically significant with P < 0.001 in all subgroups (R2 between 0.72 and 0.76). Furthermore, a prospective estimation of AVA using the developed nomograms correlated very well with invasively determined AS using the Gorlin formula (R2 = 0.76, SEE = 0.21 cm2, bias 0.04 cm2).
Conclusion: The present study has established and confirmed a solid, easy to use nomogram-based method to accurately quantify severe AS.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jen333 | DOI Listing |
JTCVS Open
December 2024
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Jefferson Health, Philadelphia, Pa.
Objective: To compare outcomes of aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with pure aortic stenosis (Pure AS) and those with pure aortic regurgitation (Pure AR) or mixed AS and AR (MAVD) in the COMMENCE trial.
Methods: Of 689 patients who underwent AVR in the COMMENCE trial, patients with moderate or severe AR with or without AS (Pure AR + MAVD; n = 135) or Pure AS (n = 323) were included. Inverse probability of treatment weighting Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used for time-to-event endpoints, and longitudinal changes in hemodynamics were evaluated using mixed-effects models.
JTCVS Open
December 2024
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Objective: The superior transseptal approach to mitral valve surgery offers improved exposure compared with left atriotomy; however, concerns remain regarding postoperative arrhythmias and pacemaker placement. This study investigates intraoperative parameters and postoperative outcomes in these approaches.
Methods: Retrospective review of 259 adults undergoing isolated mitral valve repair or replacement over a 10-year period was performed.
JTCVS Open
December 2024
Cardiothoracic Department, The National University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Objective: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a common complication after cardiac surgery that is associated with other adverse outcomes. Recent studies have shown that drainage of pericardial effusion by a posterior pericardial incision reduces the incidence of POAF. An alternative approach is a chest tube placed posteriorly in the pericardium.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJTCVS Open
December 2024
Division of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif.
Objective: The study objective was to investigate the effect of free-edge length on valve performance in bicuspidization repair of congenitally diseased aortic valves.
Methods: In addition to a constructed unicuspid aortic valve disease model, 3 representative groups-free-edge length to aortic diameter ratio 1.2, 1.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!