Upper extremity soft and rigid tissue mass prediction using segment anthropometric measures and DXA.

J Biomech

Ergonomics Department, Schukra of North America, Lakeshore, Ontario, Canada N8N 4Y3.

Published: February 2009

AI Article Synopsis

  • Researchers have created regression equations to predict bone mineral content (BMC), fat mass (FM), lean mass (LM), and wobbling mass (WM) for the upper extremities based on simple measurements like segment lengths and circumferences, which were previously only developed for the lower extremities.
  • The study involved healthy university students (38 males, 38 females) and validated the equations using DXA scans from an independent sample (24 participants).
  • The equations showed high predictive accuracy, with adjusted R(2) values between 0.854 and 0.968, enabling better estimation of tissue masses in young adults, which could help improve models for understanding the body's response to physical activities.

Article Abstract

Regression equations for predicting bone mineral content (BMC), fat mass (FM), lean mass (LM), and wobbling mass (WM) of living people from simple anthropometric measures (segment lengths, circumferences, breadths, and skin folds) have been reported in the literature for the lower extremities, but are lacking for the upper extremities. Multiple linear stepwise regression was used to generate such equations for the arm, forearm, and forearm and hand segments of healthy university aged people (38 males, 38 females). Actual tissue masses were obtained from full body Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scans and were used to validate the developed equations with an independent sample of 24 participants (12 male, 12 female). Prediction equations exhibited very high adjusted R(2) values (range from 0.854 to 0.968), with more explained variance for LM and WM than for BMC and FM. Scatter plots of actual versus predicted tissue masses revealed a close relationship (R(2) range from 0.681 to 0.951). Relative errors between the predicted and actual tissue masses for the validation group ranged from -2.2% to 15.5%, and the root-mean-squared error (RMS(error)) ranged from 7.92 to 180.26g, for BMC of the forearm and LM of the arm, respectively. These results suggest that accurate estimates of in-vivo tissue masses for the upper extremities can be predicted from simple anthropometric measurements in young adults. Access to tissue masses such as these will enable the development of more accurate models for predicting dynamic in-vivo response of the body to activities involving impact.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.11.021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tissue masses
20
anthropometric measures
8
simple anthropometric
8
upper extremities
8
actual tissue
8
tissue
6
masses
5
upper extremity
4
extremity soft
4
soft rigid
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!