Background: Motion detection thresholds with a stationary frame of reference are significantly lower than unreferenced motion thresholds. To account for this, previous studies have postulated the existence of compensatory mechanisms, driven by the presence of a surround, that cancel the effects of eye movements. In the present study we used an adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope (AOSLO) to investigate the effects of retinal jitter due to fixation eye movements on referenced and unreferenced motion thresholds.

Methods: The stimuli were produced by modulation of the AOSLO imaging beam, so that the absolute retinal position of targets was recorded. In Experiment 1 subjects made up/down motion judgments of a dark horizontal bar presented against a stationary 1-degree bright background. In Experiment 2 unreferenced motion thresholds were measured with isolated bright horizontal bars in otherwise complete darkness. In both experiments, AOSLO images for each trial were analyzed offline to extract retinal jitter and the retinal position of targets.

Results: For referenced motion, the results were consistent with complete compensation for eye movements by the visual system. In the unreferenced motion case eye movements adversely affected motion judgments, although there was evidence of partial compensation for such eye movements.

Conclusions: Compensatory processes completely cancel the effect of fixation jitter for referenced motion but such compensation is partial for unreferenced motion.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/8.14.14DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

unreferenced motion
24
eye movements
16
motion
11
referenced unreferenced
8
motion thresholds
8
retinal jitter
8
retinal position
8
motion judgments
8
referenced motion
8
compensation eye
8

Similar Publications

Background: Motion detection thresholds with a stationary frame of reference are significantly lower than unreferenced motion thresholds. To account for this, previous studies have postulated the existence of compensatory mechanisms, driven by the presence of a surround, that cancel the effects of eye movements. In the present study we used an adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope (AOSLO) to investigate the effects of retinal jitter due to fixation eye movements on referenced and unreferenced motion thresholds.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Visual tasks that are perceptually diverse might be expected to elicit unique evoked-potential waveforms that exhibit differing topographic maps. To investigate this possibility, multichannel visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded in response to several dot spatial localization stimuli that are physically similar yet produce different percepts (vernier offsets, steroscopic disparity, bisection, orientation, and relative displacement) to determine if the unique percepts arising from these stimuli reflect the activation of different cortical neural populations. The resulting evoked potentials were all similar in waveform, although the stereoscopic VEPs were relatively delayed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Sensitivity to oscillatory target motion in congenital nystagmus.

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

April 1992

College of Optometry, University of Houston, TX 77204-6052.

Despite incessant to and fro motion of their eyes, persons with congenital nystagmus rarely report illusory motion of the visual world (oscillopsia). To determine whether insensitivity to retinal image motion prevents oscillopsia, thresholds for detecting horizontal and vertical oscillatory motion of a luminous dot target were measured in subjects with congenital idiopathic nystagmus and compared to normals. Thresholds for unreferenced and referenced oscillatory motion were elevated substantially in subjects with nystagmus over the range of motion frequencies tested (0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hyperacuity thresholds for disparity, motion displacement and relative width (widths less than 10 min arc) were measured as a function of the separation between test and reference targets for separations ranging from 18-288 min arc. All three thresholds were similar in magnitude, and showed a nearly identical rise with increasing separation. Nevertheless, eccentricity, not separation, is the variable limiting all of these thresholds.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This paper describes the "motion" properties of the amblyopic fovea and compares them to the normal periphery. Specifically, thresholds for detection of the displacement of a grating pattern, and for discrimination of displacement direction were measured. The main findings of these experiments were: in the central vision of both normal and amblyopic observers, unreferenced displacement are detected with an accuracy equal to the observer's grating acuity; in the normal periphery, unreferenced motion thresholds fall off at a slower rate than does grating acuity; in amblyopic eyes, displacement thresholds are most elevated centrally; the addition of an abutting reference improves detection of motion for the normal fovea and in anisometropic amblyopes, but elevates motion thresholds in both the normal periphery and in the fovea of amblyopes with strabismus.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!