Study Design: Cross-sectional study.
Objectives: To determine prevalence rates of spondylolysis, isthmic, and degenerative spondylolisthesis in an unselected adult community-based population; and to evaluate the association of spondylolysis, isthmic, and degenerative spondylolisthesis with low back pain (LBP).
Summary Of Background Data: Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis are prevalent in the general population; however, the relationship between these conditions and LBP is controversial.
Methods: This study was an ancillary project to the Framingham Heart Study. A sample of 3529 participants of the Framingham Heart Study aged 40 to 80 years underwent multidetector CT imaging to assess aortic calcification. One hundred eighty-eight individuals were consecutively enrolled in this study to assess radiographic features potentially associated with LBP. The occurrence of LBP in the preceding 12 months was evaluated using a self-report questionnaire. The presence of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis was characterized by CT imaging. We used multiple logistic regression models to examine the association between spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis, and LBP, while adjusting for gender, age, and BMI.
Results: Twenty-one study subjects demonstrated spondylolysis on computed tomography (CT) imaging. The male-to-female ratio was approximately 3:1. Twenty-one percent of subjects with bilateral spondylolytic defects demonstrated no measurable spondylolisthesis. The male-to-female ratio of degenerative spondylolisthesis was 1:3, and the prevalence of degenerative spondylolisthesis increased from the fifth through 8 decades of life. Thirty-eight subjects (20.4%) reported significant LBP. No significant association was identified between spondylolysis, isthmic spondylolisthesis, or degenerative spondylolisthesis, and the occurrence of LBP.
Conclusion: Based on CT imaging of an unselected community-based population, the prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis is 11.5%, nearly twice the prevalence of previous plain radiograph-based studies. This study did not reveal a significant association between the observation of spondylolysis on CT and the occurrence of LBP, suggesting that the condition does not seem to represent a major cause of LBP in the general population.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3793342 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818edcfd | DOI Listing |
Eur Spine J
January 2025
College of Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Purpose: Disruptions in global sagittal spinal alignment can lead to changes in global sagittal spinal alignment, often manifesting as sagittal malalignment, where the trunk shifts forward. We proposed that these alignment changes are linked to degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DS). The objective was to assess global spinal alignment in low-grade DS using sagittal vertical axis (SVA) classification.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWorld Neurosurg
January 2025
Advanced AI Minimally Invasive Spine Center, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan; Department of Neurosurgery, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan. Electronic address:
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of the Crane reduction technique in midline lumbar fusion (MIDLF) with cortical bone trajectory screws for treating degenerative spondylolisthesis, and to identify factors affecting the reduction rate.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 87 patients (64 female and 23 male) with L4-5 degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent MIDLF and the Crane technique. Patients were categorizing using the spondylolisthesis Meyerding classification system into Grade I (59 patients) and Grade II (28 patients) groups and compared for demographics, radiographic parameters, and the spondylolisthesis reduction rate.
J Neurosurg Spine
January 2025
1Department of Orthopedics, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China.
Objective: The potential of robot-assisted (RA) single-position (SP) lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) warrants further investigation. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of RA-SP-LLIF in improving both clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion surgery.
Methods: A total of 59 patients underwent either RA-SP-LLIF (n = 31 cases) or traditional LLIF (n = 28 cases).
Brain Spine
December 2024
Medical University of Greifswald, Department of Orthopaedics, Greifswald, Germany.
Introduction: Interspinous devices are an alternative to instrumented fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with radiological instability or deformity. The devices claim to improve clinical symptoms by indirect foraminal decompression with fewer complications and similar functional outcomes compared to conventional fusion techniques, and by avoiding a (further) deterioration of the anatomy of the spine while being less invasive than instrumented fusion.
Research Question: Do interspinous devices provide a benefit in combination with a decompression of degenerative LSS?
Material And Methods: In this observational study, 117 patients were treated by decompression surgery alone (n = 37), decompression plus instrumented spinal screw fixation and anterior cage support (n = 41) or decompression plus stabilisation with interspinous devices (n = 39).
Spine J
January 2025
Hoag Orthopedics, 16300 Sand Canyon Ave., Suite. 500, Irvine, CA 92618, United States. Electronic address:
Background Context: Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is a common surgical intervention for treating lumbar degenerative disorders. Increasing demand has contributed to ever-increasing healthcare expenditure and economic burden. To address this, cost-utility analyses (CUAs) compare value in the context of patient outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!