Introduction And Hypothesis: The aim of this study is to provide long-term outcome data, at least 10 years, following laparoscopic colposuspension.

Methods: The study includes a control group who underwent open colposuspension. A consecutive series of 139 women who had undergone laparoscopic colposuspension were reviewed and compared to 52 women who had an open colposuspension in the same unit. Subjects were contacted by telephone, at least 10 years post-operatively, at which time a structured interview was performed which included the short-form Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptom questionnaire.

Results: There was deterioration in subjective cure rates from 71% and 67% at 6 months to 52% and 36% at 10 years for the laparoscopic and open procedures, respectively.

Conclusion: This study provides evidence that laparoscopic colposuspension is probably as durable as open colposuspension. However, cure rates for both procedures appear to deteriorate over time, emphasising the importance of long-term follow-up.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0798-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

laparoscopic colposuspension
12
open colposuspension
12
long-term outcome
8
years laparoscopic
8
cure rates
8
colposuspension
6
laparoscopic
5
outcome laparoscopic
4
colposuspension 10-year
4
10-year cohort
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!