Central sensitisation phenomena in primary headaches: overview of a preventive therapeutic approach.

CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets

Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences Department, Bari Aldo Moro University, Italy.

Published: December 2008

Central sensitisation phenomena have been well recognized in the development of migraine attacks and tension type headache. It is also known that headache frequency is related to sensitization. Though some studies have focused on the effects of symptomatic treatment on allodynia, few reports have described the action of preventive agents on the facilitating factors for central sensitisation. In this study we aim to review the factors concurrent with an increase in central sensitisation, in view of the choice of preventive agents for primary headaches. Central sensitisation phenomena are increased in pain syndromes with psycho-pathological co-morbidities. For instance, sleep disorders are a frequent symptom in headache, prevailing in chronic forms and in patients with psychiatric comorbidity. Sleep deprivation is also a factor producing hyperalgesic changes. It is known that symptoms attributable to central sensitization are diffusely pronounced in fibromyalgic (FMS) patients, and that FMS co-morbidity is frequent in primary headaches and associated with higher frequency and poorer quality of life. We report our preliminary experience in a group of 20 chronic migraine patients, treated with duloxetine 60 mg/die vs a self-management program including stretching (relaxation training) and exercise (cervical-dorsal flexion and rotation) to decrease strength and flexibility of muscles of cervical and dorsal spine headache patients. Both the treatments were effective on headache frequency and pericranial tenderness, although FMS comorbidity significantly reduced their efficacy on migraine and quality of life. The whole spectrum of action of pharmacological and non pharmacological treatments on central sensitisation mechanisms, and on their facilitating factors, should be taken into account for the best preventive therapeutic approach of primary headaches.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/187152708787122932DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

central sensitisation
24
primary headaches
16
sensitisation phenomena
12
preventive therapeutic
8
therapeutic approach
8
headache frequency
8
preventive agents
8
facilitating factors
8
quality life
8
central
7

Similar Publications

Objective: To investigate the central sensitization (CS) in patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases (ACTDs) and its relationship with disease activity, laboratory findings, medical treatments, organ involvements, and comorbidity.

Methods: One hundred and eleven patients with ACTDs and 40 healthy individuals were included. All patients were divided into three groups in terms of their diseases: Sjögren's syndrome (SS), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Our understanding of osteoarthritis (OA) has evolved from a degenerative disease to one in which low-grade, chronic inflammation plays a central role. In addition, evidence suggests that OA is accompanied by both peripheral and central nervous system sensitization that can cause pain. It has been demonstrated that transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) can relieve pain, inflammation, and central sensitization in other conditions including fibromyalgia, pelvic pain, and headaches.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Central sensitisation (CS) increases musculoskeletal pain. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) or self-report questionnaires might indicate CS. Indices of CS might be suppressed by exercise, although the optimal exercise regimen remains unclear.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Tell me what to expect: how instructions affect the pain response of patients with chronic myofascial pain with referral.

J Oral Facial Pain Headache

December 2024

Neuroscience of Emotion Cognition and Nociception Group (NeuroCEN Group), Faculty of Odontology, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.

The aims of the study are to analyze the influence of pain and no pain expectations on the physiological (electromyography (EMG) and pupillometry) and cognitive (Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)) response to pain. Pain expectation and no pain expectation situations were induced by employing instructional videos. The induction of pain was performed by palpating the masseter with an algometer in a sample of 2 groups: 30 healthy participants (control group) and 30 patients (Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) group) with chronic myofascial pain with referral in the masseter muscle (Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Dissorders (DC/TMD)).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) comprise a group of conditions affecting the masticatory muscles, the temporomandibular joints and associated structures, often manifesting as orofacial pain and functional limitations of the mandible. Central sensitization (CS) is gaining increasing attention in research focused on pain syndromes and somatization, playing a significant role in the pain experience. This study investigates the prevalence of CS and somatization among TMD patients, analyzing their relationships with TMD diagnoses and the intensity of chronic masticatory muscle pain (MMP).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!