Purpose: Open and laparoscopic surgical approaches each have specific advantages. This study compares ambulation, hospital length of stay (LOS), and incision length after open and laparoscopic colorectal resection.
Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing colorectal resection over a 2 year period ending August 2002 were followed prospectively. Ambulation, LOS, and incision length were recorded. Hybrid low anterior resection (LAR) patients had laparoscopic splenic flexure takedown, vessel ligation, and proximal rectal mobilization followed by planned inferior laparotomy to complete the case. Groups were compared using Student's t test.
Results: Equivalent open and laparoscopic groups were comparable in terms of gender, age, body mass index, ASA class, indication for operation, and resection performed. Seventy open colectomy patients were compared with 99 laparoscopic-assisted colectomy patients. On average, patients in the open and laparoscopic groups ambulated 67 and 390 feet, respectively, on postoperative day 1 (P < .001), 290 and 752 feet on day 2 (P < .001), and 495 and 965 feet on day 3 (P < .001). The average LOS in the open group was 9.3 days compared with 5.9 days in the laparoscopic group (P < .001). The average incision length in the open group was 19.7 cm compared with 5.3 cm in the laparoscopic group (P < .001). Seventeen open LAR patients were compared with 30 hybrid LAR patients. On average, patients in the open and hybrid groups ambulated 22 and 150 feet, respectively, on postoperative day 1 (P = .003), 105 and 433 feet on day 2 (P = .003), and 369 and 488 feet on day 3 (P = .43). The average LOS in the open group was 10 days compared with 8.5 days in the hybrid group (P = .46). The average incision length in the open group was 19.8 cm compared with 10.8 cm in the hybrid group (P < .001). When all 216 patients were considered, the 91 patients with incisions shorter than 8 cm (average 4.6 cm) ambulated 396, 752, and 956 feet on consecutive days whereas the 125 patients with incisions 8 cm or longer (average 16.9 cm, P < .001) ambulated 101, 334, and 521 feet on consecutive days (all P values <.001). Average LOS in the <8-cm group was 6 days compared with 8.9 days in the > or =8-cm group (P < .001).
Conclusions: Patients undergoing minimal-access colorectal surgery ambulated significantly further than equivalent open patients in the early postoperative period and had a shorter LOS.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1553350608330478 | DOI Listing |
Langenbecks Arch Surg
January 2025
Department of General Surgery, Westküstenklinikum Heide, Esmarchstraße 50, 25746, Heide, Germany.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of transitioning from open to laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma in a primary care hospital setting. Despite the recognized benefits of laparoscopic surgery in postoperative recovery and its demonstrated oncological equivalence, only a minority of patients (30-40%) in Germany undergo laparoscopic procedures, primarily due to concerns which, in addition to the perioperative quality data and economic aspects, focus on patient safety.
Methods: Over a three-year period (2012-2014), the transformation process was observed in a colorectal cancer center.
NPJ Digit Med
January 2025
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
This systematic review explores machine learning (ML) applications in surgical motion analysis using non-optical motion tracking systems (NOMTS), alone or with optical methods. It investigates objectives, experimental designs, model effectiveness, and future research directions. From 3632 records, 84 studies were included, with Artificial Neural Networks (38%) and Support Vector Machines (11%) being the most common ML models.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMedicine (Baltimore)
November 2024
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Sanliurfa Training and Research Hospital, Sanliurfa, Turkey.
Is it possible for a low-volume surgeon to enhance their surgical skills without performing actual surgeries by utilizing virtual reality headsets and emerging technologies? It has been observed that the time spent by surgical assistants in the operating room decreased after the post-shift leave regulation. In the literature, the use of virtual reality simulations as a support tool in surgical training is recommended. Although the efficacy of virtual reality surgical simulations in surgeries such as arthroscopy and laparoscopy has been proven, there are limited studies on their effect in open surgeries.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
December 2024
General Surgery, Universidad de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza García, MEX.
Obesity has been regarded as an epidemic in recent years. Various treatments have been developed, with bariatric surgery showing the highest levels of safety and effectiveness. This has increased its popularity and demand not only among young adults but also among elderly patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Surg
December 2024
Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Background: This study aims to compare outcomes of colorectal cancer surgeries performed using the newly developed articulating laparoscopic instrument, ArtiSential, with those using conventional non-articulating or rigid laparoscopic instruments.
Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, matched cohort study enrolled patients with colorectal cancer undergoing laparoscopic surgery in seven tertiary referral hospitals from January 2021 to October 2022. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed between the articulating (Arti-LAP) and conventional (Rigid-LAP) laparoscopic groups.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!