Purpose: To assess the effect of wearing powdered gloves during embryo transfer as compared to un-powdered gloves on the pregnancy outcome of IVF cycles.
Methods: Patients, undergoing embryo transfer procedures, were prospectively randomized into two groups: In the first (group A, n=356) group embryo transfer was performed while wearing powdered gloves; in the second (group B, n=356) group embryo transfer was performed while wearing un-powdered gloves. The primary end point of the study was the clinical pregnancy rate.
Results: The two groups were comparable with respect to the mean age, mean number of grade one embryos obtained, and the mean number of embryos transferred. The clinical pregnancy rates of the two groups were not different.
Conclusions: Powdered gloves, worn during embryo transfer, have no adverse effect on the pregnancy outcome of IVF cycles.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2649338 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-008-9285-3 | DOI Listing |
Objective: To compare pregnancy outcomes and serum progesterone levels between women who took sublingual (SL) progesterone lozenges versus intramuscular (IM) progesterone-in-oil for endometrial preparation and luteal support in programmed frozen embryo transfer (pFET) cycles.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Subjects: All patients who underwent pFET of a single euploid good-quality blastocyst between January 2018 and April 2023 at a single fertility center.
Fertil Steril
January 2025
Shady Grove Fertility, Rockville, MD, USA.
Objective: To compare the cost-effectiveness of a gestational carrier to a uterine transplantation in the treatment of absolute uterine-factor infertility.
Design: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision-tree mathematical model comparing a gestational carrier to a uterine transplantation.
Subjects: Published literature was used to derive costs for solid organ transplant, immunosuppression, gestational carrier obtainment, in vitro fertilization, preimplantation genetic testing, and frozen embryo transfer.
Genomics
January 2025
Reproductive Medicine Center, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; Hubei Clinical Research Center for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Health, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China. Electronic address:
Background: Current endometrial receptivity analysis is invasive, preventing embryo transfer during the biopsy cycle. This study aims to screen serum sncRNAs as non-invasive biomarkers for ERA tests.
Methods: The study included 12 infertile patients undergoing IVF-ET and ERA, whose serum samples were collected for high-energy sequencing technology to detect sncRNA expression profiles.
J Assist Reprod Genet
January 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
PGT-A, what's it for? Considering the increase in fetal aneuploidies with a woman's age and the high number of miscarriages associated with fetal karyotype anomalies, the concept of selecting IVF embryos based on their karyotype in order to transfer only euploid embryos and eliminate aneuploid ones was proposed. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) was then established, nearly 30 years ago, with the expectation that the transfer of euploid embryos would lead to a significant improvement in medically assisted reproduction (MAR) outcomes. PGT-A, what's wrong? Despite the practice and widespread use, PGT-A has not consistently proven its effectiveness.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFertil Steril
January 2025
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore's Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Health, Hartsdale, New York.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!