A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of torsional and linear mode ultrasonic coagulating shears for sealing veins. | LitMetric

Comparison of torsional and linear mode ultrasonic coagulating shears for sealing veins.

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A

Academic Unit of Surgery, The General Infirmary at Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.

Published: December 2008

Background: Torsional mode ultrasonic coagulating shears are an alternative device to linear mode shears for hemostatic cutting. The aim of this study was to compare the vessel-sealing quality of torsional and linear mode ultrasonic coagulating shears on human veins.

Materials And Methods: Veins were harvested from 15 patients during varicose vein surgery. Each vessel was sealed and cut by both devices at different sites. The seals were either tested for burst pressure or examined microscopically to compare mural thickness, seal length, and extent of coagulation and lateral thermal effect.

Results: For veins 2.0-3.0 mm in diameter, the median burst pressure was higher on seals made with torsional mode shears (245, IQR 161-360 mm Hg vs. 133, IQR 101-165 mm Hg; P = 0.001). Similarly, for veins 3.5-4.5 mm in diameter, the median burst pressure was higher with torsional mode shears (149, IQR 118-212 mm Hg vs. 94, IQR 82-126 mm Hg; P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the median burst pressure for veins 5.0-6.0 mm in diameter (82, IQR 61-132 mm Hg vs. 76, IQR 40-114 mm Hg; P = 0.268). Seals made with torsional mode shears showed significantly greater seal length (517 +/- 300 microm vs. 316 +/- 147 microm; P = 0.016), more tissue coagulation (467 +/- 197 microm vs. 335 +/- 128 microm; P = 0.015), and greater lateral thermal effect (1479 +/- 340 microm vs. 1116 +/- 253 mum; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Torsional mode ultrasonic shears produced more secure seals on veins up to 4.5 mm in diameter. This can be explained by the greater seal length produced by torsional mode shears.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/lap.2008.0066DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

torsional mode
24
mode shears
20
mode ultrasonic
16
burst pressure
16
linear mode
12
ultrasonic coagulating
12
coagulating shears
12
seal length
12
median burst
12
mode
9

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!