Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Vaginal wall cysts and pelvic organ prolapse, although commonly encountered, rarely occur together. Typically, the differential diagnosis of vaginal wall prolapse includes anterior and/or posterior wall support defects. Although large vaginal cysts have the potential to disturb normal vaginal supports, these coexisting abnormalities are rarely reported.
Case: A 39-year-old multipara woman presented with a progressively enlarging vaginal bulge for 6 years, erroneously diagnosed as an enterocele with a unilateral paravaginal support defect. The enterocele was subsequently confirmed to be a 10 x 5-cm, thick-walled cystic mass histologically confirmed to be a Bartholin gland abscess.
Conclusion: Unusual forms of vaginal prolapse require adequate ancillary investigation such as imaging to avoid diagnostic error and to improve preoperative planning and treatment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!