Background: Whether time between biopsy and surgery for malignant melanoma affects clinical outcomes is sparsely defined. This study evaluated factors influencing surgical interval and surgical interval effect on outcomes.

Methods: We performed a review of a prospective 10-year, single-institution database.

Results: There were 473 patients treated for 478 malignant melanomas. The mean surgical interval was 30.5 days. The mean thickness was 2.1 mm; 46% of patients had a surgical interval of more than 28 days whereas 8% had a surgical interval of more than 56 days. Residual melanoma was found at excision in 170 (36%) patients. Age, sex, and referral source significantly affected surgical interval, however, lesion thickness, sentinel lymph node status, ulceration, and residual melanoma at excision did not. In univariate Cox models, neither a surgical interval of 28 or less nor less than 56 days showed better overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS). In multivariate Cox models of OS and DFS including lesion thickness, sentinel lymph node status, ulceration, and residual melanoma at excision, neither a surgical interval of 28 days or fewer nor a surgical interval of 56 days or fewer significantly affected outcomes.

Conclusions: Age, sex, referral source, and lesion thickness were associated with surgical interval. Immediate surgery for malignant melanoma does not significantly impact OS or DFS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.07.044DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

surgical interval
40
interval days
20
surgery malignant
12
malignant melanoma
12
residual melanoma
12
melanoma excision
12
lesion thickness
12
surgical
10
interval
10
factors influencing
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!