Purpose: The present study aimed to measure the internal consistency, inter-rater-reliability and validity of the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS II) for its application to stroke patients and their closest others.

Method: Patients were assessed 6 months and 1 year after stroke with the self- and proxy-rating versions of the WHODAS II. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) as well as patients' statements about 'Recovery' and 'Independence' were used as measurements for validity. Patients' statements concerning individual restrictions and limitations were compared with the WHODAS II items.

Results: Internal consistency can be regarded as good to excellent, inter-rater-reliability as satisfactory to good. Item reliability ranged from insufficient to good, the percentage of agreements was below 80%. WHODAS II scale scores of patients with an mRS score of 0 as well as of recovered and independent patients differed significantly from others. Correlation coefficients between WHODAS II Scales and validation measures ranged from fair to high. Correspondence between stroke related problems and WHODAS II items was good.

Conclusion: The WHODAS II is a valid, generally reliable and useful instrument for the assessment of stroke patients over the first year after stroke.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638280802355262DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

whodas
8
internal consistency
8
stroke patients
8
year stroke
8
patients' statements
8
stroke
6
patients
5
whodas people
4
people stroke
4
stroke relatives
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: Mental disorders are highly prevalent among children, yet access to timely and effective treatment remains limited. Untreated or poorly managed mental disorders in children are associated with significant functional deterioration and long-term consequences. The validation of reliable assessment tools is crucial for identifying functional impairments and guiding interventions in this population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction And Objective: A biopsychosocial model for assessing the functioning of patients with musculoskeletal diseases is essential for planning health services for this patient group. For this purpose, the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and the 'core sets' created on its basis are used. The aim of this study was to validate and evaluate the effectiveness of the application of the ICF classification in the assessment of patients with musculoskeletal problems in outpatient rehabilitation facilities.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Homelessness is a deeply ingrained aspect of our culture. It has a detrimental influence on people of all ages' physical and mental well-being, child development, academic success and the establishment and upkeep of families. Homelessness and mental illness have a reciprocal relationship that makes them two interrelated social issues that affect people's ability to function and communities all over the world.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Symptom severity and social functioning are important outcomes after first episode psychosis (FEP), yet current evidence about associations between them is inconsistent and lacks (subclinical) momentary insights.

Methods: The current Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) study was conducted in 58 people in remission from FEP, as part of the HAMLETT (Handling Antipsychotic Medication: Long-term Evaluation of Targeted Treatment) trial. At baseline, participants were prompted to report momentary mental states and social context 10x/day for eight consecutive days, including psychotic experiences (PEs), motivation/drive and negative affect, that may indicate proxies of (subclinical) psychotic, negative and general affective symptoms, respectively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Identifying influences on disability accumulation in multiple sclerosis (MS), including modifiable factors other than the core features of disease itself, is vital for clinical care, but has often relied on instruments with acknowledged psychometric shortcomings. We model MS disability using the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0, a validated measure based on the WHO's biopsychosocial model and sensitive to the breadth of disability-related domains important to people, to investigate the factors associated with its trajectory after diagnosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!