Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine changes in axillary artery diameter and peak systolic velocity in asymptomatic individuals during upper limb positioning commonly used to assess vascular pathology in athletes.
Design: Repeated measures observational study.
Setting: Physiology laboratory.
Participants: Subjective and objective screening excluded individuals with past, or present, conditions related to neurovascular compression syndromes. Thirty-one subjects (21 females, 10 males; mean age: 25+/-4 years) were included in the final analysis.
Main Outcome Measures: Sonographically determined axillary artery diameter and peak systolic velocity, as well as symptom production, were recorded for a series of 12 randomised arm positions, incorporating varying degrees of abduction, external rotation, and horizontal flexion/extension.
Results: The majority of arm positions revealed no change in artery diameter and peak systolic velocity. However, at the extreme of abduction, and arm positions incorporating 120 degrees abduction, significant (p<0.0005) reductions in axillary artery diameter were noted. All mean results masked wide heterogeneity: 13% demonstrating a greater than 50% reduction in diameter, 10%, a doubling of peak systolic velocity, and 42%, reporting symptoms.
Conclusions: The number of individual clinically "positive" responses questions the specificity of individual diagnostic tests, such as the hyperabduction manoeuvre, and highlights the need to interpret test results in conjunction with the subjective assessment and other physical findings from the objective assessment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2008.06.009 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!