Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Since the Endotine forehead fixation device (Coapt Systems, Palo Alto, CA) was introduced in 2003, a small percentage of surgeons and patients have complained of persistent palpability and sensitivity related to its 12- to 15-month absorption time. Therefore, a refinement of the original design, the Ultratine (Coapt Systems), consisting of a polymer blend altered for faster absorption and biodegradability, was introduced in 2006.
Objective: The authors report early results of fixation using the Ultratine with respect to permanence of elevation and the duration of visibility, palpability, and sensitivity of the implant.
Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective review of patients who had undergone brow lift with Ultratine forehead fixation, along with concomitant cosmetic procedures.
Results: Ten patients were available for follow-up at 14 months postoperatively. In many cases, the implant biodegraded and absorbed at the 3- to 6-month intervals, and symptoms of visibility, palpability, and sensitivity were markedly improved over the original Endotine device.
Conclusions: The Ultratine degradation profile produces secure, permanent fixation and elevation for endoscopic brow lifts while diminishing the long-lasting side effects of visibility, palpability, and sensitivity exhibited by a small proportion of patients with the original Endotine device. It is an option particularly for those patients who have thin scalps or fine hair. The Endotine may still be the best choice for patients with heavier brows; tighter, more immobile brows; and for secondary cases. It may also be preferable in cases of reverse brow procedures intended to lower the hairline.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asj.2008.07.013 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!