Liver retransplantation (re-LT) is the only therapeutic option for irreversible failure of the graft. It currently makes up 2.9% to 24.0% of all liver transplants. It is technically very difficult and has a high index of immediate complications, underlined by the fact that 50% of the deaths after this procedure occur in the first three months; and that in general, the results of re-LT are worse than those of primary LT. Re-LT can be early (when it is performed during the first 30 days) or delayed. The reasons for early re-LT are: loss of primary function of the graft, complications for technical reasons, acute resistant rejection and infection problems of biliary origin. Those of delayed are: chronic rejection, liver arterial thrombosis, biliary complications and recurrence of the primary disease. In general, when a patient has an irreversible rejection of the graft, the indication for a re-LT is indisputable, but there are discrepancies on whether or not the aetiology of the basic disease has to have a bearing on this. If we take into account the MELD scoring system, when considering the indications for re-LT, this only allows us to predict mortality, but not to give priority on a waiting list. Patients must be retransplanted early, in good physical condition, with a low bilirubin and creatine level; and the donors must be young. Taking into account the continuing increase in mortality as a direct result of the imbalance between the growing number of potential candidates and the number of donors, it seems necessary to define what are the minimally accepted results to indicate a re-LT and thus arrive at a consensus that will help us decide which subject is a candidate to receive it.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0009-739x(08)75915-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

re-lt
7
[indications liver
4
liver retransplantations]
4
retransplantations] liver
4
liver retransplantation
4
retransplantation re-lt
4
re-lt therapeutic
4
therapeutic option
4
option irreversible
4
irreversible failure
4

Similar Publications

Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with cholestasis following liver transplantation.

Abdom Radiol (NY)

November 2024

Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Infectious Diseases and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Article Synopsis
  • Biliary strictures are common after liver transplantation, and when endoscopic techniques fail, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) can be an effective alternative.
  • A study involving 56 liver transplant recipients showed that PTBD has a high success rate (98%) and can improve various lab indicators, although the risk of subsequent biliary complications depends on the type of stricture present.
  • Patients who achieved internal drainage into the small intestine had better 12-month survival rates compared to those needing external drainage, highlighting the importance of the initial PTBD approach.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study analyzed the effects of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) on waitlist mortality and liver transplantation access in Budd-Chiari Syndrome (BCS) patients using the UNOS database from 2002 to 2024.
  • Among 815 BCS patients, those who received TIPS had lower severity scores, lesser urgent statuses, and longer waitlist times for liver transplants compared to non-TIPS patients.
  • The findings revealed that while TIPS use increased over time and led to improved medical conditions at the time of transplantation, it was associated with lower access to liver transplantation and a lower risk of waitlist mortality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Liver retransplant is the only option to save a patient with liver graft failure. However, it is controversial due to its poor survival outcome compared to primary transplantation. Insufficient deceased organ donation in Taiwan leads to high waitlist mortality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

There is no recent update on the clinical course of retransplantation (re-LT) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the US using recent national data. The UNOS database (2002-2023) was used to explore patient characteristics in initial LT, comparing deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) and LDLT for graft survival (GS), reasons for graft failure, and GS after re-LT. It assesses waitlist dropout and re-LT likelihood, categorizing re-LT cohort based on time to re-listing as acute or chronic (≤ or > 1 mo).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Has the risk of liver re-transplantation improved over the two decades?

Clin Transplant

December 2023

Division of Abdominal Transplant, Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA.

Background: Despite advancements in liver transplantation (LT) over the past two decades, liver re-transplantation (re-LT) presents challenges. This study aimed to assess improvements in re-LT outcomes and contributing factors.

Methods: Data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database (2002-2021) were analyzed, with recipients categorized into four-year intervals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!