A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Dual energy exposure control (DEEC) for computed tomography: algorithm and simulation study. | LitMetric

Dual energy exposure control (DEEC) for computed tomography: algorithm and simulation study.

Med Phys

Institute of Medical Physics, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Henkestr 91, Erlangen 91052, Germany.

Published: November 2008

DECT means acquiring the same object at two different energies, respectively two different tube voltages U1 and U2. The raw data q1 and q2 undergo a decomposition process of type p = p(q1,q2). The raw data p are reconstructed to obtain monochromatic images of the attenuation mu, of the object density rho, or of a specific material distribution. Recent advances in DECT focus on noise reduction techniques [S. Richard and J. H. Siewerdsen, Med. Phys. 35(2), 586-600 (2008)] and enable high performance DECT such as lung nodule detection [Shkumat et al., Med. Phys. 35(2), 629-632 (2008)]. Given p and a raw data-based projection-wise patient dose estimation D(alpha) the authors determine the optimal tube current curves I1(alpha) and I2(alpha), with alpha being the view angle, which minimizes image noise for a given patient dose level. DEEC can perform online; I1(alpha) and I2(alpha) can be determined during the scan. Simulation studies using semianthropomorphic phantom data were carried out. In particular, functions p that generate mu-images and density images were evaluated. Image quality was compared to standard scans at U0=120 kV (clinical CT) and U0=45 kV (micro-CT) that were taken at the same dose level (D0=D1 + D2) and identical spatial resolution. Appropriate choice of p(q1, q2) allows to obtain mu-images that show fewer artifacts and yield image noise levels comparable to the noise of the standard scan. The authors compared the standard scan to mu-images at 70 keV, which is the effective energy used in clinical CT, and found optimal results with mu-images at 25 keV for micro-CT. Nonoptimal choice of the decomposition function will, however, significantly increase image noise. In particular mu-images at 511 keV, as needed for PET/CT attenuation correction, exhibit more than twice as much image noise as the standard scan. With DEEC, which guarantees best dose usage possible, monochromatic images are generated with only slightly increased noise levels at the same dose compared to a standard scan. The benefit of significantly decreased artifacts appears to allow using DEEC-generated monochromatic images in daily routine. Furthermore, DEEC is not restricted to DECT and the inherent tube current modulation algorithm may also be applied to single energy CT.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2982150DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

image noise
16
standard scan
16
monochromatic images
12
compared standard
12
raw data
8
med phys
8
phys 352
8
patient dose
8
tube current
8
i1alpha i2alpha
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!