Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
At our department, 46 constrained acetabular components in 38 patients were placed successively for a period of 4 years. Indications included recurrent dislocation, septic and aseptic loosening with extensive bone loss, tumor surgery with extensive bone resection, and instability due to neurologic impairment. Because 2 cup failures and 10 dislocations were observed with the constrained devices at 4 to 7 years of follow-up, the authors started to use large-diameter metal-on-metal bearings for similar indications. A series of 36 such bearings in 38 patients revealed only one cup failure and one dislocation at 2 to 4 years of follow-up. Although the 2 series are different and therefore difficult to compare, the authors recommend judicious use of constrained devices because of the high failure rate (26%) and consideration of alternative options such as the use of large-diameter metal-on-metal bearings.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2008.10.010 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!