Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Bergerac-type chimeras of spectrin SH3 were designed by extending a beta-hairpin by eight amino acids so that the extension protruded from the domain body like a "nose" being exposed to the solvent. A calorimetric study of several Bergerac-SH3 variants was carried out over a wide range of pH values and protein concentrations and the three-dimensional structure of one of them, SHH, was determined. X-ray studies confirmed that the nose had a well defined beta-structure whilst the chimera formed a stable tetramer within the crystal unit because of four tightly packed noses. In the pH range of 4-7 the heat-induced unfolding of some chimeras was complex and concentration dependent, whilst at pH values below 3.5, low protein concentrations of all the chimeras studied, including SHH, seemed to obey a monomolecular two-state unfolding model. The best set of data was obtained for the SHA variant, the unfolding heat effects of which were systematically higher than those of the WT protein (about 16.4 kJ/mol at 323 K), which may be close to the upper limit of the enthalpy gain due to 10 residue beta-hairpin folding. At the same time, the chimeras with high nose stability, which, like SHH, have a hydrophobic (IVY) cluster on their surface, showed a lower apparent unfolding heat effect, much closer to that of the WT protein. The possible reasons for this difference are discussed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpc.2008.10.011 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!