European multicentre study in children born small for gestational age with persistent short stature: comparison of continuous and discontinuous growth hormone treatment regimens.

Background: The most effective growth hormone (GH) treatment regimen for increasing height in short children born small for gestational age (SGA) has not been well defined.

Methods: Short SGA children (n = 151, age 3-8 years, height less than -2.5 standard deviation scores) were randomised to receive low-dose GH for 2 years (0.033/0.033 mg/kg/day, n = 51), high-dose GH for 1 year and then no treatment for 1 year (0.100/0 mg/kg/day, n = 51) or were untreated for 1 year then received mid-dose GH for 1 year (0/0.067 mg/kg/day, n = 47). Height, bone age and adverse events were determined at check-ups every 3 months.

Results: The mean +/- SD additional height gain with GH after 1 year, relative to untreated controls, was higher with discontinuous high-dose than with continuous low-dose GH (6.5 +/- 0.2 vs. 3.3 +/- 0.2 cm). After 2 years, the additional height gain was similar between high- and low-dose GH groups (between-group treatment difference = 0.2, 95% CI = -0.8 to 1.2 cm, p = 0.702). Patients treated exclusively in the last year had a similar height gain to those in the other treatment groups (p = 0.604).

Conclusions: In short SGA children, continuous low-dose and discontinuous high-dose GH regimens were associated with similar height gain. Treatment with mid-dose GH for 1 year also led to a similar improvement in growth.