[The European countries confronting cancer: a set of indicators assessing public health status].

Bull Cancer

Institut national du cancer, 28, avenue Hoche, 94320 Thiais, France.

Published: November 2008

Context: We now know that efficient public policies for cancer control need to be global and take into account each and all the factors involved: economics and level of development, style of life and risk factors, access to screening, effectiveness of the care-providing system. A very simple scorecard is proposed, based on publicized public health indicators, which allows a comparison between European countries.

Methodology: We extracted 49 indicators from public databases and literature concerning 22 European countries. We made correlation calculations in order to identify relevant indicators from which a global score was extracted. Using a hierarchical clustering method we were then able to identify subsets of homogeneous countries.

Results: A 7 indicator scorecard was drawn up: national gross product, scientific production, smoking rate, breast screening participating rate, all cancer mortality rate (male population), 5 years relative survival for colorectal cancer and life expectancy at birth. A global score shows: 1) the better positioned countries: Switzerland, Sweden, Finland and France; 2) the countries where cancer control is less effective: Estonia, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. Three subsets of countries with a fairly similar profile were identified: a high level of means and results group; a high level of means but a medium level of results group; and a low level of means and results group.

Conclusion: This work emphasizes dramatically heterogeneous situations between countries. A follow-up, using a reduced but regularly updated set of public health indicators, would help induce an active European policy for cancer control.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1684/bdc.2008.0737DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

public health
12
cancer control
12
european countries
8
health indicators
8
global score
8
high level
8
level group
8
countries
6
cancer
6
indicators
5

Similar Publications

Frontline Clinic Administrator Perspectives on Extreme Weather Events, Clinic Operations, and Climate Resilience.

J Ambul Care Manage

January 2025

Author Affiliations: Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Drs Wiskel and Dresser); Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Center for Climate, Health, and the Global Environment, Boston, Massachusetts (Drs Wiskel and Dresser); Americares, Stamford, Connecticut (Mr Matthews-Trigg, Ms Stevens, and Dr Miles); and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Drs Wiskel, Dresser, and Bernstein).

Climate-sensitive extreme weather events are increasingly impacting frontline clinic operations. We conducted a national, cross-sectional survey of 284 self-identified administrators and other staff at frontline clinics determining their attitudes toward climate change and the impacts, resilience, and preparedness of clinics for extreme weather events. Most respondents (80.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Community health workers (CHWs) play a significant role in supporting health services delivery in communities with few trained health care providers. There has been limited research on ways to optimize the role of CHWs in HIV prevention service delivery. This study explored CHWs' experiences with offering HIV prevention services [HIV testing and HIV pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP and PEP)] during three pilot studies in rural communities in Kenya and Uganda, which aimed to increase biomedical HIV prevention coverage via a structured patient-centered HIV prevention delivery model.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Causal Inference With Observational Data and Unobserved Confounding Variables.

Ecol Lett

January 2025

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA.

Experiments have long been the gold standard for causal inference in Ecology. As Ecology tackles progressively larger problems, however, we are moving beyond the scales at which randomised controlled experiments are feasible. To answer causal questions at scale, we need to also use observational data -something Ecologists tend to view with great scepticism.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!