Clinicians must promptly decide which patients suspected of having heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) warrant a change in anticoagulation. This single-centre series of 246 HIT testing referrals assessed the combination of clinical score (thrombocytopenia, timing, thrombosis, other causes of thrombocytopenia not evident; 4T's), Diamed ID-Heparin-PF4 immunoassay (PaGIA) and 14C Serotonin Release Assay (SRA) to develop a practical and safe diagnostic strategy for HIT. A total of 142/256 (58%) referrals were in patients with a low 4T's score, with 12/246 (5%) in the high scoring group. PaGIA was positive in 24/246 (9.7%) patients, whilst SRA was positive in 9/246 (3.6%). The overall positive predictive value of a positive PaGIA test alone was 37.5%, however this reached 80% for the high scoring group. Both negative PaGIA and low clinical score independently had negative predictive values of 100%. We subsequently developed an algorithm that, when applied to this cohort, would have resulted in 18/246 patients (7%) definitely requiring alternative anticoagulation, whilst a further 7/246 (2.8%) patients would have been considered on an individual basis. Ultimately (based on SRA) this would have resulted in 16/246 (6.5%) patients unnecessarily having a change in their anticoagulation, with 9/246 (3.6%) patients being 'correctly treated'. The combination of 4T's scoring and PaGIA permitted a practical and safe approach to rapid HIT diagnosis and management.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07401.x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!