A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Predicted and measured plasma propofol concentration and bispectral index during deep sedation in patients with impaired left ventricular function. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study assessed how well the Schnider pharmacokinetic model predicts plasma propofol levels in patients with reduced heart function receiving deep sedation.
  • It involved 34 patients undergoing a procedure, where the model significantly underestimated the actual propofol concentrations, with a mean prediction error of 37%.
  • BIS values varied greatly among individuals during sedation, indicating that BIS monitoring is not reliable for determining deep sedation levels in this particular patient group.

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the ability of the Schnider pharmacokinetic model to predict plasma propofol concentration during target-controlled propofol infusion in patients with impaired left ventricular function and to investigate the predictive value of the bispectral index (BIS) to indicate deep sedation in this patient group.

Design: Prospective, observational study.

Participants: Thirty-four patients (mean left ventricular ejection fraction 31% +/- 9%) undergoing the implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator during deep sedation.

Interventions: None.

Measurements And Main Results: Predicted and measured propofol plasma concentrations and BIS were assessed during steady-state conditions with the propofol infusion rate constant for at least 20 minutes. The plasma propofol concentration was significantly underestimated by the pharmacokinetic model used (mean percentage prediction error 37% +/- 49%). The 50% probability of deep sedation was calculated at a predicted propofol concentration of 2.09 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.04-2.14) mug/mL and at a measured propofol concentration of 2.70 (95% CI, 2.62-2.78) mug/mL. BIS values showed a marked variability among individuals during deep sedation (5th-95th percentiles: 25-81).

Conclusions: The pharmacokinetic model used markedly underestimated propofol plasma levels in the patient group studied. The large variability among patients suggests that BIS monitoring is not suitable for indicating an exact endpoint corresponding to deep sedation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2008.08.016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

propofol concentration
20
deep sedation
20
plasma propofol
12
left ventricular
12
pharmacokinetic model
12
propofol
9
predicted measured
8
patients impaired
8
impaired left
8
ventricular function
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!