A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Chlorhexidine diminishes the loss of bond strength over time under simulated pulpal pressure and thermo-mechanical stressing. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • This study aimed to examine the impact of chlorhexidine (CHX) digluconate at different concentrations (0.2% and 2%) on the durability of dentin bonding using two adhesive systems: etch-and-rinse and self-etch.
  • The research involved testing on 24 human third molars where the bonding systems were applied, followed by microtensile tests after immediate use and 6 months of simulated stress.
  • Results indicated that the 2% CHX concentration helped maintain bond strength significantly better over time compared to the lower concentration, especially with the etch-and-rinse adhesive, while the self-etch adhesive showed some limitations with 0.2% CHX.

Article Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of chlorhexidine (CHX) digluconate at 0.2% and 2% on dentin bonding durability of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems.

Methods: In this study were used 24 extracted non-carious human third-molars. The occlusal surfaces of the molar crowns were removed with a low-speed diamond saw to expose flat dentin surfaces. The tested materials were Single-Bond (SB) (two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive) and Clearfil Tri S Bond (CTSB) (all-in-one self-etch adhesive) used in association or not with CHX at 0.2% and 2%. The bonding systems were applied according to manufacturer's instructions and followed by composite application (Z250). For each condition, half of the specimens was immediately submitted to microtensile test and half of them was submitted to long-term storage of 6 months under simulated pulpal pressure and thermo-mechanical stressing before testing. The data were analyzed using Two-Way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test (alpha=0.05). Failure patterns of the specimens were observed using scanning electron microscopy.

Results: The falling % in bond strength over the 6-month period was: SB control-43.64%; SB/0.2%CHX-23.79%; SB/2%CHX-26.42%; CTSB control-40.94%; CTSB/0.2%CHX-37.07%; CTSB/2%CHX-22.14%. The fracture modes were predominantly adhesive, mainly in the specimens of terminal groups.

Conclusions: CXH digluconate at 2% was able to diminish loss of microtensile bond strength over time associated to both etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives. Lower concentration of CHX (0.2%) was not able to diminish the loss of bond strength over time when associated to the self-etch adhesive CTSB.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.10.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bond strength
16
strength time
12
self-etch adhesive
12
loss bond
8
simulated pulpal
8
pulpal pressure
8
pressure thermo-mechanical
8
thermo-mechanical stressing
8
etch-and-rinse self-etch
8
chx 02%
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!