A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Agreement of blood pressure measurements between random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The random-zero sphygmomanometer was tested against a standard mercury sphygmomanometer among 2007 Chinese participants aged 15 to 60 to assess blood pressure measurements.
  • Measurements from the random-zero device were consistently lower by about 2.7 to 3.0 mm Hg for systolic and 0.9 to 1.4 mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure, with significant statistical differences.
  • High correlation coefficients (0.90 for systolic and 0.85 for diastolic) indicated strong agreement between the two devices, despite the average lower readings from the random-zero sphygmomanometer.

Article Abstract

The random-zero sphygmomanometer has been widely used in observational studies and clinical trials for blood pressure measurement. We examined the agreement of blood pressure measurements between random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers among 2007 Chinese study participants aged 15 to 60 years. Three blood pressure readings were obtained by trained observers using random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers, respectively, in a random order. Overall, blood pressure readings obtained using the random-zero device were significantly lower than those obtained with the standard mercury sphygmomanometer, with a mean difference ranging from -3.0 to -2.7 mm Hg for systolic and -1.4 to -0.9 mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure (all P < 0.01). Correlation coefficients between mean blood pressure measurements obtained using the random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers were high (0.90 for systolic and 0.85 for diastolic blood pressure, both P < 0.0001). In conclusion, our study indicated that there was strong agreement between blood pressure measurements obtained using the random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers although blood pressure values were on average lower with the random-zero sphygmomanometer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2587170PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31816956acDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

blood pressure
40
standard mercury
24
random-zero standard
20
mercury sphygmomanometers
20
pressure measurements
16
measurements random-zero
16
agreement blood
12
pressure
10
blood
9
random-zero
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!