Unlabelled: The objective of the present study was to assess the public accessibility of orthodontic care in Lithuania.
Material And Methods: In 2008, a request for the information about various aspects of public orthodontic care during 2000-2007 in Lithuania was submitted to the State Patients' Fund at the Ministry of Health. The data on the demographic distribution of orthodontists in Lithuania were received from the Lithuanian Dental Chamber. The authors of the paper also analyzed the national legislation regulating the State Patients' Fund expenditure on orthodontic care and treatment.
Results: In 2007, there were 73 orthodontists-practitioners in Lithuania, most of them highly concentrated in major cities and towns: most of them were practicing in Vilnius (22) and Kaunas (20), while there were only 5 orthodontists in Klaipeda, 4 in Siauliai, 3 in each of Panevezys and Marijampole. The public orthodontic treatment is rendered only to patients suffering from most severe pathologies. With the constantly increasing expenditure of the State Patients' Fund, the national public orthodontic care system definitely undergoes significant development: the number of patients who received the treatment with removable and with fixed orthodontic appliances was gradually increasing during 2002-2007, with however, a very small number of new facilities for ambulatory treatment facilities of orthodontists (consultations included). The number of patients who received treatment with removable orthodontic appliances was specifically higher in Siauliai and Telsiai, Panevezys and Utena districts, with fixed orthodontic appliances - in Vilnius and Alytus, Kaunas and Marijampole, Panevezys and Utena regions. The analysis of the availability of public orthodontic treatment showed a marked increase in the number highly-specialized ambulatory facilities in Vilnius and Alytus district in 2002-2007.
Conclusions: Specialists providing orthodontic treatment in the country are highly concentrated, while in general public orthodontic treatment undergoes development at the moment. The accessibility of orthodontic treatment in Lithuania, especially in the regions distant from Vilnius and Kaunas, remains inadequate.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Dentoskeletal effects of molar distalization with miniscrew-anchored cantilever and pendulum appliance for Class II correction.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
January 2025
Department of Orthodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
Introduction: The objective of this study was to compare the dental and skeletal changes promoted by the miniscrew-anchored cantilever and pendulum appliance for Class II correction.
Methods: This retrospective study involved 52 patients with Class II malocclusion divided into 2 groups according to the treatment received: the miniscrew group (MG) with 23 patients (14 females and 9 males; mean initial age of 12.42 years) treated using the miniscrew-anchored cantilever, and the pendulum group (PG) with 29 patients (21 females and 8 males; mean initial age of 13.
Volumetric and tridimensional root resorption and alveolar bone changes in Class II malocclusion extraction protocol treated with clear aligners and fixed orthodontic appliances: A comparative study.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
January 2025
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China. Electronic address:
Introduction: This study aimed to assess the root resorption and alveolar bone changes of maxillary incisors volumetrically and 3-dimensionally in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion who underwent treatments involving the extraction of 4 first premolars with conventional fixed appliances (FAs) vs clear aligners (CAs).
Methods: A total of 320 maxillary incisors from 80 patients were assessed and divided into 2 groups (FAs and CAs), each possessing similar baseline characteristics. Pretreatment and posttreatment cone-beam computed tomography scans were used to analyze linear and volumetric orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption, alveolar bone thickness (ABT), alveolar bone height (ABH), as well as anteroposterior and vertical movements of maxillary incisors.
Influence of Conservative or Invasive Treatments on the Occurrence of Sequelae in Permanent Successors After Injuries in the Support Tissues of Incisors Deciduous Teeth: A Cohort Study.
Dent Traumatol
January 2025
Departament of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro-UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Objective: To assess the influence of conservative or invasive treatments on the appearance of sequelae in permanent successor teeth (SPT) after injuries in the support tissues of anterior deciduous teeth (ISTDT).
Methods: This cohort study accompanied 52 children with ISTDT up to the complete eruption of the permanent successor to investigate the presence or not of SPT. Trauma was clinically evaluated according to the International Association for Dental Traumatology.
Assessing Caries Removal Efficacy and Pain Perception in Children, Using Smart Bur Versus Carbide Bur: A Randomized Clinical Study.
Med Sci Monit
January 2025
Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
BACKGROUND Dental caries removal is conventionally done using carbide burs, but non-metallic polymer burs have recently been developed with the aim of being more selective and causing less pain. The objective of the study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of caries removal, time taken, and patient compliance during restorations using smart bur and carbide burs in pediatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A clinical study was designed and conducted at the Pedodontics Outpatient Department, with a focus on 40 children between 6 and 12 years old, who were split into 2 groups consisting of 20 children each: group 1, using a carbide conventional rotary bur, and group 2, using a smart bur.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSecond Versus First Molar Extractions in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treatment: A Retrospective Longitudinal Outcome Study into Maxillary Canine, Premolar, and Molar Movement.
J Clin Med
January 2025
Radboudumc 3D Lab, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, P. O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
This retrospective longitudinal outcome study comparing orthodontic extraction modalities, including extraction of maxillary first or second molars, aimed to compare the three-dimensional tooth movement of maxillary canines (C), premolars (P1, P2), and molars (M1, M2) in Class II division 1 malocclusion treatment with fixed appliances. A sample of 98 patients (mean age 13.20 ± 1.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!