The development of small-diameter active fixation pacing and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads may be associated with increased risk for delayed right ventricular perforation. The management of this unforeseen complication has been poorly described. Eleven successive patients referred for right ventricular subacute or delayed perforation (no evidence of lead perforation at the time of the procedure, perforation of the right ventricle diagnosed > or =5 days after implantation) were reviewed. The perforation was related to a pacing (n = 7) or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (n = 4) lead. The main symptoms were major dyspnea with pericardial effusion requiring emergency pericardial drainage (n = 3), inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock (n = 1), syncope (n = 2), abdominal pain (n = 1), mammary hematoma (n = 1), diaphragm stimulation (n = 1), and chest pain (n = 1). One patient was strictly asymptomatic. Signs of lead dysfunction were observed in all 11 patients. The diagnosis of lead perforation was confirmed by chest x-ray, echocardiography, or computed tomography. Surgery was directly performed in 1 patient with suspicion of digestive perforation. In the remaining 10 patients, the leads were removed by simple traction under fluoroscopic guidance in the operating room, with surgical backup support. The need for close monitoring was highlighted by the occurrence in 1 patient of tamponade requiring percutaneous pericardiocentesis and urgent surgical revision. The postoperative course of these patients was unremarkable. In conclusion, subacute ventricular perforation is a rare but potentially life threatening complication of lead implantation. In most patients, the leads can safely be removed under fluoroscopic guidance, with surgical backup support and close monitoring.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.07.025 | DOI Listing |
J Interv Card Electrophysiol
January 2025
Rooney Heart Institute, 311 9th St N #201, Naples, FL, 34102, USA.
Introduction: The role of the sympathetic nervous system in the initiation and continuation of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA) is well established. However, whether CSD reduces implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks and recurrent VTA is still uncertain.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed at Medline and Embase until March 2023.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
January 2025
Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.
Background: Guideline-recommended strategies to interrupt chronic anticoagulation with warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) during the perioperative period of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) surgery differ worldwide. There is uncertainty concerning the benefits and harms of interrupted and uninterrupted anticoagulation in patients undergoing CIED surgery.
Objectives: To assess the benefits and harms of interrupted anticoagulation (IAC) with either warfarin or DOAC in the perioperative period of CIED surgery versus uninterrupted anticoagulation (UAC), with or without heparin bridging, during an equivalent time frame, for CIED surgery.
CJC Open
January 2025
Genetics and Genome Biology, Research Institute, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sudden cardiac death is a leading cause of mortality in children with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The PRecIsion Medicine in CardiomYopathy consortium developed a validated tool (PRIMaCY) for sudden cardiac death risk prediction to help with implantable cardioverter defibrillator shared decision-making, as recommended by clinical practice guidelines. The mplemeting a udden Cardiac Dath isk Assessment ool in hildhood (INSERT-HCM) study aims to implement PRIMaCY into electronic health records (EHRs) and assess implementation determinants and outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPacing Clin Electrophysiol
January 2025
Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, People's Republic of China.
Background: The evidence in the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) by using implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) is well-established but remains controversial for those with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). This study evaluates whether prognostic differences exist between ICM and NICM patients after ICD implantation.
Methods: Patients initially undergoing ICD implantation as primary SCD prevention were retrospectively enrolled from January 2017 to May 2023.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol
January 2025
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Background: This study aimed to compare inappropriate shock (IAS) rates between subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) and transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) in Brugada syndrome (BrS) patients and identify risk factors for IAS in S-ICD use.
Methods: We enrolled consecutive patients with BrS who underwent ICD implantation between 2013 and 2023. Data on clinical characteristics, S-ICD screening test data, and IAS occurrence were retrospectively analyzed.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!