The aim of this study was to compare biological collagen I (ColI) and synthetic poly-(L: -lactide) (PLLA) nanofibers concerning their stability and ability to promote growth and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. Matrices were seeded with human stem cells and cultivated over a period of 28 days under growth and osteoinductive conditions and analyzed during the course. During this time the PLLA nanofibers remained stable while the presence of cells resulted in an attenuation of the ColI nanofiber mesh. Although there was a tendency for better growth and osteoprotegerin production of stem cells when cultured on collagen nanofibers, there was no significant difference compared to PLLA nanofibers or controls. The gene expression of alkaline phosphate, osteocalcin and collagen I diminished in the initial phase of cultivation independent of the polymer used. In the case of PLLA fibers, this gene expression normalized during the course of cultivation, whereas the presence of collagen nanofibers resulted in an increased gene expression of osteocalcin and collagen during the course of the experiment. Taken together the PLLA fibers were easier to produce, more stable and did not compromise growth and differentiation of stem cells over the course of experiment. On the other hand, collagen nanofibers supported the differentiation process to some extent. Nevertheless, the need for fixation as well as the missing stability during cell culture requires further work.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10856-008-3634-8 | DOI Listing |
Methods Mol Biol
January 2025
Instituto Cajal, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain.
In the Drosophila brain, neuronal diversity originates from approximately 100 neural stem cells, each dividing asymmetrically. Precise mapping of cell lineages at the single-cell resolution is crucial for understanding the mechanisms that direct neuronal specification. However, existing methods for high-resolution lineage tracing are notably time-consuming and labor-intensive.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMethods Mol Biol
January 2025
Life Science Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Cell lineage analysis is primarily undertaken to understand cell fate specification and diversification along a cell lineage tree. Built with dual repressible markers, twin-spot mosaic analysis with repressible cell markers (MARCM) labels the two daughter cells made by a common precursor in distinct colors. The power of twin-spot MARCM to systematically subdivide complex lineages is exemplified in studies of Drosophila neural stem-cell lineages.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMethods Mol Biol
January 2025
Instituto Cajal, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain.
StarTrack is a powerful multicolor genetic tool designed to unravel cellular lineages arising from neural progenitor cells (NPCs). This innovative technique, based on retrospective clonal analysis and built upon the PiggyBac system, creates a unique and inheritable "color code" within NPCs. Through the stochastic integration of 12 distinct plasmids encoding six fluorescent proteins, StarTrack enables precise and comprehensive tracking of cellular fates and progenitor potentials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMethods Mol Biol
January 2025
Stem Cell Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
The CRISPR-activated repair lineage tracing (CARLIN) mouse line uses DNA barcoding to enable high-resolution tracing of cell lineages in vivo (Bowling et al, Cell 181, 1410-1422.e27, 2020). CARLIN mice contain expressed barcodes that allow simultaneous interrogation of lineage and gene expression information from single cells.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!