A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Efficacy of portable X-ray in identifying retained suture needles in ophthalmologic cases. | LitMetric

Efficacy of portable X-ray in identifying retained suture needles in ophthalmologic cases.

Eye (Lond)

Department of Ophthalmology, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA 02130, USA.

Published: August 2009

Aims: To evaluate the role and efficacy of portable X-ray in reliably identifying retained suture needles in ophthalmologic surgical cases.

Methods: Ophthalmologic 10-0 nylon suture needles were placed into 10 of 20 porcine eyes positioned within the orbit of a human skull. Portable, plain film radiographs were taken of all eyes with a C-arm fluoroscopy machine. The films were reviewed by six ophthalmologists and six radiologists who were blinded to the presence or absence of needles, as well as the number of needles used in the protocol. The sensitivity and specificity of identifying retained suture needles by plain film radiographs were then analysed based on the results of the physicians' interpretations of the films.

Results: The overall sensitivity and specificity for physicians reviewing radiographs with suspected intraoperative suture needles were 54 and 77%, respectively. When looking separately at radiologists reviewing the films, the sensitivity was 57% and the specificity was 87%. Ophthalmologists reviewing the films identified retained needles less reliably with a sensitivity of 51% and a specificity of 67%.

Conclusions: Significant controversy exists regarding the reliability and utility of plain film radiography in identifying intraocular foreign bodies. This study demonstrates that the use of plain film radiographs to rule-out the presence of an intraocular surgical needle is neither a sensitive nor specific imaging modality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/eye.2008.320DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

suture needles
20
plain film
16
identifying retained
12
retained suture
12
film radiographs
12
efficacy portable
8
portable x-ray
8
needles
8
needles ophthalmologic
8
sensitivity specificity
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!