AI Article Synopsis

  • A randomized clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of a manual physical therapy and exercise (MTE) treatment for mechanical neck pain and upper extremity symptoms compared to a minimal intervention (MIN) approach.
  • * The study involved 94 patients, measuring various outcomes like neck disability, pain levels, and patient satisfaction over multiple time points.
  • * Results showed that the MTE group experienced significantly greater improvements in pain and disability scores as well as higher rates of perceived treatment success after one year compared to the MIN group.

Article Abstract

Study Design: Randomized clinical trial.

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of manual physical therapy and exercise (MTE) for mechanical neck pain with or without unilateral upper extremity (UE) symptoms, as compared to a minimal intervention (MIN) approach.

Summary Of Background Data: Mounting evidence supports the use of manual therapy and exercise for mechanical neck pain, but no studies have directly assessed its effectiveness for UE symptoms.

Methods: A total of 94 patients referred to 3 physical therapy clinics with a primary complaint of mechanical neck pain, with or without unilateral UE symptoms, were randomized to receive MTE or a MIN approach of advice, motion exercise, and subtherapeutic ultrasound. Primary outcomes were the neck disability index, cervical and UE pain visual analog scales (VAS), and patient-perceived global rating of change assessed at 3-, 6-, and 52-weeks. Secondary measures included treatment success rates and post-treatment healthcare utilization.

Results: The MTE group demonstrated significantly larger reductions in short- and long-term neck disability index scores (mean 1-year difference -5.1, 95% confidence intervals (CI) -8.1 to -2.1; P = 0.001) and short-term cervical VAS scores (mean 6-week difference -14.2, 95% CI -22.7 to -5.6; P = 0.001) as compared to the MIN group. The MTE group also demonstrated significant within group reductions in short- and long-term UE VAS scores at all time periods (mean 1-year difference -16.3, 95% CI -23.1 to -9.5; P = 0.000). At 1-year, patient perceived treatment success was reported by 62% (29 of 47) of the MTE group and 32% (15 of 47) of the MIN group (P = 0.004).

Conclusion: An impairment-based MTE program resulted in clinically and statistically significant short- and long-term improvements in pain, disability, and patient-perceived recovery in patients with mechanical neck pain when compared to a program comprising advice, a mobility exercise, and subtherapeutic ultrasound.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318183391eDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mechanical neck
20
neck pain
20
physical therapy
12
therapy exercise
12
mte group
12
short- long-term
12
effectiveness manual
8
manual physical
8
exercise mechanical
8
randomized clinical
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!